Buy Essay Papers Here - Bob Ross - Wikipedia
Nov 17, 2017 Bob ross cause of death,
business plan lounge Use Business Plan Pro to bob ross edit this sample plan and The Namesake, make it your own. Bob Ross Cause! Over 500+ additional sample plans also included. Restaurant - Fine Dining. The Namesake Essay! Gabri's Lounge Restaurant is a 60 seat fine-dining restaurant with a 20 seat lounge. We focus on our New American-Swedish menu with a touch of Asian influence. We will be located in the booming, and rapidly expanding, borough of Long Branch, New Jersey 'on the shore.' The outlook for the future of Long Branch is promising. Developers are recreating a $150 million first-class resort project. The old pier will be rebuilt with ferry service to bob ross cause of death Manhattan, New York City, beach cabanas, boardwalk and a bike path over a total of 25 acres. There will be 100,000 sq. ft. of Conservation Resource Management, commercial space, and over 700 residential units with condo and townhouses ranging from bob ross $200,000-$500,000; rentals from Conservation Management $1000-$2,500 a month, and a two-tier garage. The combination of these elements will provide the city with a year-round economy.
The area is in need of bob ross cause, a warm and friendly place with excellent food. A place where you always know you will get the Conservation and Natural best of cause of death, everything. Gabri's Lounge Restaurant will feature a cozy dining room and an elegant lounge. Comfortable furnishings and decor with soothing warm tones. The lounge has comfy couches and antique love seats with a softly lit bar. Revolutionary On Politics Essays! It will be the perfect place to bob ross of death stop in for a bite to eat, for a drink or for Resource Management, a small business meeting.
For extra comfort and to please a large group of people we will make up special hors d' oeuvre platters for customers. The menu will be inspired from different countries' specialties and appeal to a diverse clientele. You can get Swedish specialties like herring, gravlax and meatballs, or you can go a little bit more International and choose a red curry chicken with basmati rice, or an cause of death, Asian grilled shrimp with spinach, tofu and black bean sauce. We will also have a special pasta dish entree every day plus the ethos in letter from birmingham 'all American meal' such as barbecue beef ribs and cause, baked beans. In Letter From Birmingham! Adding value will be an cause of death, interesting business lunch menu with specialties every day. Conservation And Natural! The menu will change every 3-4 months but keep the favorites.
Prices will be competitive with other upscale restaurants in the area. However, it is the strategy of Gabri's Lounge Restaurant to give a perception of bob ross, higher value than its competitors, through its food, service and Essay, entertainment. Cause Of Death! The lounge and restaurant will be open seven days a week. We will offer special theme nights to attract new customers to Gabri's. The restaurant will be fine dining in a cozy atmosphere. Warm colors, fresh flowers, soft music, candles and Model of Leadership Essay, amazing artwork from some of the areas most notable new artists. This will contribute to a sense of bob ross of death, community and give new artists a chance to irony in frankenstein show their work for cause, a diverse clientele. During the busy summer months you can also sit outside on ethos birmingham jail our patio and we will offer a special summer menu, featuring lighter fare, exotic drinks, as well as non-alcoholic offerings. Cause! The patio and garden setting will be a fun and ray bradbury will soft rains, casual atmosphere for the summer crowd.
The service will be relaxed, very friendly and bob ross cause of death, correct. We will hire the best people available, training, motivating and Management, encourage them, and bob ross of death, thereby retaining the rythem and blues artists friendliest most efficient staff possible. Our management team is comprised of individuals whose backgrounds consist of bob ross cause of death, 50 years experience in ethos in letter food, restaurant and of death, hotel, catering, management, finance, marketing, art and motion pictures. Catering will be a major part of the business. There Soft Rains! Leave it to bob ross of death Linda Catering already has an The Namesake, established clientele and bob ross cause, we are growing each and in frankenstein, every day. We feel in bob ross of death today's hectic work schedule customers don't always have time to set up that birthday party or other event that we all need and want.
Now customers can leave it to irony in frankenstein pros and bob ross, get the napoleon finest, most memorable party or dinner ever. We have years of bob ross of death, experience in the catering business and rythem and blues, know what an bob ross cause, important client wants and will come, needs. Cause! We will have a large International menu for customers to select from, and we will offer full catering service providing everything from table settings to Influences the dessert. Bob Ross! We anticipate our total sales allocation to beethoven be 85% restaurant sales and 15% catering sales. The combined cost of bob ross, sales will be 33% producing a gross profit of 67% on total sales. Most important to rythem and blues artists us is our financial success and we believe this will be achieved by bob ross cause of death, offering high-quality service and beethoven napoleon, excellent food with an bob ross of death, interesting twist.
We have created financial projections based on birmingham jail our experience and bob ross cause, knowledge of the area. With a start-up expenditure of $385,000 we can generate $1,085,465 in ray bradbury there come rains sales by the end of of death, year two, and produce good net profits by ray bradbury soft rains, the end of cause, year three. Conservation! We are seeking an cause, SBA 7(A) loan guaranty for $200,000 with a 7% interest rate. We are investing $60,000 of our own capital and Conservation and Natural Resource, seeking to raise an additional $125,000 from investors. Our preferred instrument will be five year subordinated notes with an attractive coupon rate of 12% for the first two years and cause, 15% for the remaining three years. Conservation Resource! At the end of bob ross of death, five years the investors' notes will have matured and ray bradbury will rains, original principal plus a 2% premium and bob ross of death, the final interest payment will be made. Our investor philosophy is conservative.
Since restaurant start-ups are so speculative our belief and commitment to Model our investors will be to pay a generous, predictable rate of bob ross, return while not strangling our operational cash flow. As our business becomes more established and rythem, reliable, our ability to pay an bob ross of death, improved return of Revolutionary On Politics Essays, capital will be evidenced by an increased coupon rate of 15% of bob ross cause of death, original principal. At maturity we feel it proper to retire the Model of Leadership notes with a 2% premium to bob ross cause original principal invested. Gabri's Lounge Restaurant's objectives for the first three years of operation includes: Keeping food cost under 35% revenue. Keeping employee labor cost between 24-29% of revenue. Stay as a small restaurant with excellent food and service. Essay! Averaging sales between $1,000,000-1,500,000 per year. Cause! Promote and expand Leave it to Linda Catering in New Jersey New York City.
Expand our marketing and advertising in Essay New Jersey and New York. Achieve 12% return on bob ross cause investment to beethoven investors for the first two years and 15% for the next three years. Gabri's is a great place to bob ross cause of death eat, combining an Revolutionary On Politics Essays, intriguing atmosphere with excellent, interesting food. The mission is not only to have great tasting food, but have efficient and friendly service because customer satisfaction is paramount. We want to bob ross cause be the in frankenstein restaurant choice for bob ross cause, all families and On Politics, singles, young and cause of death, old, male or female. Employee welfare will be equally important to On Politics our success. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! Everyone will be treated fairly and beethoven napoleon, with the cause of death utmost respect. We want our employees to feel a part of the success of beethoven, Gabri's Lounge and Restaurant. Happy employees make happy guests. We will combine menu variety, atmosphere, ambiance, special theme nights and a friendly staff to create a sense of 'place' in order to of death reach our goal of over all value in the dining/entertainment experience. We want fair profits for the owners, and in letter from jail, a rewarding place to work for the employees.
The creation of a unique and bob ross cause of death, innovative fine dining atmosphere will differentiate us from the Conservation and Natural Resource Management competition. Bob Ross! The restaurant will stand out Model Essay from the other restaurants in the area because of the unique design and decor. Bob Ross Cause! We will offer a fine dining experience in there will come soft rains a cozy atmosphere. Product quality. Bob Ross! Not only great food but great service and atmosphere. The menu will appeal to Essay a wide and varied clientele. Of Death! It is International with an of Leadership Essay, interesting twist.
We will have special theme nights like restaurant nights, local artist's openings, Easter dinners, Swedish Midsummer party, Fourth of bob ross cause of death, July celebration, Labor Day weekend, wine tasting dinners, special ethnic food nights, and Swedish smA¶rgA?sbord. All this will attract a varied clientele to beethoven Gabri's. Leave it to Linda Catering already has an bob ross cause, established clientele in the area. Controlling costs at On Politics Essays, all times without exception. Due to intense competition, restauranteurs must look for cause, ways to differentiate their place of beethoven napoleon, business in order to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage. Bob Ross Cause! The founders of Gabri's realize this. With the re-development of Long Branch, it needs a place that will fit into the 'new look' of the there will come community that is sophisticated and entertaining. Cause Of Death! The fact that no other restaurants in the area has this concept and irony, atmosphere presents us with a window of opportunity and an entrance into a profitable niche in bob ross cause of death the market.
Use Business Plan Pro to edit this sample plan and make it your own. Over 500+ additional sample plans also included.
Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online - Did Bob Ross die of lymphoma from his years of exposure to oil paints
Buying essays online - Bob Ross - Television Personality, Painter - Biography com
Nov 17, 2017 Bob ross cause of death,
How to be a fan of of death problematic things. I like things, and and blues, some of those things are problematic. Cause Of Death! I like Lord of the in frankenstein, Rings even though it’s pretty fucked up with regard to women and race (any narrative that says “this whole race is evil” is fucked up, okay). I like A Song of Ice and Fire even though its portrayal of of death people of colour is problematic, and often I find that its in-text condemnation of patriarchy isn’t obvious enough to justify the sexism displayed. I like the rythem, movie Scott Pilgrim vs The World even though it is racist in its portrayal of Matthew Patel, panders to stereotypes in its portrayal of Wallace, and trivialises queer female sexuality in its portrayal of Ramona and bob ross of death, Roxy’s relationship. For fuck’s sake, Ramona even says “It was a phase”! How much more cliche and offensive could this movie be? Oh wait, remember how Scott defeats Roxy, his only female adversary, by making her orgasm?
Excuse me while I vomit…and then keep watching because I still like the rest of the movie. Liking problematic things doesn’t make you an asshole. In fact, you can like really problematic things and still be not only of Leadership Essay, a good person, but a good social justice activist (TM)! After all, most texts have some problematic elements in them, because they’re produced by humans, who are well-known to be imperfect. But it can be surprisingly difficult to own up to the problematic things in the media you like, particularly when you feel strongly about bob ross cause, it, as many fans do. The Namesake! We need to cause of death find a way to enjoy the media we like without hurting other people and marginalised groups. So with that in Conservation and Natural Management, mind, here are my suggestions for bob ross of death things we should try our darnedest to irony in frankenstein do as self-confessed fans of problematic stuff. Firstly, acknowledge that the thing you like is problematic and do not attempt to make excuses for it.
It is a unique irritation to encounter a person who point blank refuses to admit that something they like is problematic. Infuriatingly, people will often actually articulate some version of the argument “It can’t be problematic because I like it, and I’m nice”. Alternatively, some fans may find it tempting to bob ross of death argue “Well this media is a realistic portrayal of societies like X, Y, Z”. But when you say that sexism and racism and ray bradbury there soft, heterosexism and cissexism have to be in bob ross cause, the narrative or the story won’t be realistic, what you are saying is that we humans literally cannot recognise ourselves without systemic prejudice, nor can we connect to characters who are not unrepentant bigots. Um, yikes. And Natural Resource Essay! YIKES, you guys. And even if you think that’s true (which scares the bob ross cause, hell out of me), I don’t see you arguing for an accurate portrayal of everything in your fiction all the time. For example, most people seem fine without accurate portrayal of what personal hygiene was really like in 1300 CE in their medieval fantasy media. (Newsflash: realistically, Robb Stark and in letter, Jon Snow rarely bathed or brushed their teeth or hair). In real life, people have to of death go to the bathroom. In movies and books, they don’t show that very much, because it’s boring and Essay, gross.
Well, guess what: bigotry is also boring and bob ross of death, gross. But everyone is just dying to keep that in the script. Especially do not ever suggest that people not take media “so seriously”, or argue that it’s “just” a tv show. The narratives that we surround ourselves with can subtly, subconsciously influence how we think about ourselves and rythem and blues artists, others. That’s why creating imaginary fantasy and sci fi worlds that have more equal societies can be a powerful thing for marginalised people, who mainstream media rarely acknowledges as heroes. But even if you don’t think that media matters, there is still no reason to cause of death focus exclusively on unequal or problematic fictional worlds and narratives. If it doesn’t matter, why don’t YOU stop taking your media so seriously and The Namesake, stop fighting us on bob ross of death this?
You with your constant demands for your narrow idea of The Namesake “realism” (which by the way often sounds a lot like “show me naked skinny ciswomen, and gore”). If in your framework tv shows aren’t serious business, why does realism matter? Why can’t you accept that it would be totally cool to have AT LEAST ONE BIG MEDIEVAL FANTASY EPIC WHERE WOMEN AND POC WERE LIKE, EQUAL TO WHITE MEN AND STUFF. STOP TAKING IT SO SERIOUSLY. Secondly, do not gloss over the issues or derail conversations about the problematic elements. Okay, so you can admit that Dune is problematic. But wait, you’re not done! You need to be willing to engage with people about it! It’s not enough to cause of death be like “Ok, I admit that it’s problematic that the major villain is a fat homosexual rapist, but come on, let’s focus on the giant sandworms!”.
Shutting people down, ignoring or giving minimal treatment to their concerns, and refusing to fully engage with their issues is a form of of Leadership oppression. Bob Ross Cause! Implicitly, you’re giving the message that this person’s feelings are less important than your own. In fact, in in letter birmingham, this case you’re saying that their pain is less important than your enjoyment of a book, movie or tv show. So when people raise these concerns, listen respectfully and try to understand the views. Do not change the topic.
Thirdly you must acknowledge other, even less favourable, interpretations of the media you like. Bob Ross Cause! Sometimes you still enjoy a movie or book because you read a certain, potentially problematic scene in a certain way – but others read it entirely differently, and there will soft, found it more problematic. For example, consider the scene in of death, Game of Thrones where Drogo rapes Dany (which he does not do in the books). One of my friends feels that it was portrayed like rape fetish porn, sexualising the act and Dany’s pain. But I feel that the scene focuses on Dany’s pain and The Namesake Essay, tears in bob ross cause of death, a manner that is and Natural Management, not fetishising them (though even so the narrative is still totally fucked up because Dany and cause of death, her rapist then go on to have a good, sexyfuntimes relationship…uh, no, HBO). Model Of Leadership Essay! I don’t agree with my friend’s interpretation but I recognise it as a totally valid reading of the scene. Also, as a fan of problematic media, you need to respect the fact that others may be so upset or angered by media you love that they don’t want to engage with it at all. In fact, one of my best friends won’t watch HBO’s Game of Thrones because of the cause, racism and irony in frankenstein, misogyny. That’s a completely legitimate and valid response to bob ross cause of death that tv show, and me trying to convince her to give it another shot would be disrespectful and hurtful. If you badger others to see what you see in something when they are telling you it’s not enjoyable for them, you’re being an entitled jerk. And Blues! You’re showing yourself to be willing to hurt a real person over a television show.
That really is a sign you’re taking things too seriously. As fans, sometimes we need to cause remember that the things we like don’t define our worth as people. So there’s no need to defend them from every single criticism or pretend they are perfect. Really loving something means seeing it as it really is, not as you wish it were. Ethos In Letter Jail! You can still be a good fan while acknowledging the bob ross, problematic elements of the irony in frankenstein, things you love. In fact, that’s the only way to cause of death be a good fan of problematic things. Rachael is irony in frankenstein, a queer, nerdy, aneurotypical, white cisfemale with a bachelor's degree in economics and a give 'em hell attitude. She has a culturally unacceptable amount of cause of death body fat but sometimes passes, and she accesses some forms of thin privilege but not others. She believes in and blues, leveraging the privilege one has in order to smash the kyriarchy.
She is a big geek, an atheist, a skeptic, and bob ross, a fan of science. In her spare time she enjoys meditation, going to therapy, and in frankenstein, shouting. View all posts by Rachael. 248 thoughts on “How to be a fan of problematic things” Reading this blog makes me a better person. It’s also entertaining and funny #128578; Aw, yay. Best comment ever. Cause Of Death! #128578;
I agree with Olek. When it was pointed out to me that Firefly has very few (if any) asian actors and characters, despite the world supposedly being an amalgam of China and America, it made me feel funny. On the one hand I loved the show, but on the other felt sort of irony in frankenstein bad for bob ross cause liking it when it had this striking omission. But you’re right, acknowledging and The Namesake Essay, engaging with these problematic things is best – I think if it were pointed out to Joss (and if the show had continued), he might have rectified this, because he is not a bad person, just maybe seeing through one type of privileged/blinkered lense. Thanks!
I have heard that about bob ross cause, Firefly, although I’m not a fan of the Essay, show myself. As an outsider, the bob ross, experience of interacting with fans who are willing to engage with that issue is really different to interacting with those who try to make excuses or change the Model Essay, subject. Interacting with that second group is hard for an outsider because when you ask questions you are often made to feel like you’re attacking them or being really rude, when in fact you’re just seeking information. I think these attitudes make fandom more tense, and less enjoyable. Regarding Joss Whedon and Firefly, it pains me to cause of death say (as someone who dearly loves his work) but I don’t have a lot of confidence that he Would rectify it. Ray Bradbury Will Come Rains! He has written truly remarkable narratives problematising heteronormativity, misogyny, and cause of death, the silencing or sexual abuse victims, but his racialisations are consistently problematic. Over the The Namesake Essay, course of four television series’ and a feature film – all with large ensemble casts – he has had six major roles of of death colour: three of those were black men with short tempers and propensities towards violence (two heroes and one villain), a pliant and servile east Asian woman, a wise old “magical negro” man, and a “masculine” (by television standards) black woman with a strong sex drive. There Soft! And all of these, All of them, are characters I love – I don’t think they are one-dimensional stereotypes, but the fact that they fit so nicely _inside_ their stereotypes and the general lack of critical awareness surrounding race-narratives in bob ross cause, concert with the really overtly problematic episodes (Anyone remember the “Thanks Giving” episode of Buffy?) makes it difficult for me to believe that he’s even slightly done the work to be ethical around racialisations. With Firefly’s racial balance, Joss wouldn’t have been able to fix the issue, as FOX execs had pretty much ingrained it. The Tams were supposed to be Chinese, but the studio were all like ‘two asian heroes? and neither of them does kung fu? (until the Essay, movie)… naah, and history has shown that they were looking for ways to get out of funding the bob ross cause, show before it even began as it was.
So, weak on the issue, but not actively racist in this instance. This does not excuse the final product, but it shouldn’t be on Joss alone that it happened. So, weak on the issue, but not actively racist in this instance. Yes actively racist, but perhaps not intentionally so. There Will Come Rains! This is the perfect example of institutionalised and systematic racism. Whedon probably can’t be blamed for the whole issue, but that’s exactly the point. Systematic oppression is when prejudiced actions go through a number of gatekeepers and pass every single one without someone raising the issue. Systematic oppression is when prejudiced actions go through a number of bob ross gatekeepers and pass every single one without someone raising the issue. This is an excellent definition.
I shall be making reference to it elsewhere, I have little doubt. This would probably have been that same fitting-inside-the-stereotype issue, though. Two Asian major characters who are also the two smart, nerdy, highly educated characters? Um. Well, in there soft, the case of Firefly, the show was already pushing it’s luck by having two prominent minority cast members (who actually had something to do other than being a minority) anyway. They also didn’t play the card of having a minority that was atypical of what mainstream audiences think of when they picture that minority ; i.e. Keanu is “part- Asian”, so he can be a Meiji era samurai.
It also had strong female characters, and more than one. Yeah, lack of any strong Asian presence, especially given the premise is cause, noticeable, but one show can’t solve all ills, which we tend to want movies, books and art to do. It’s a problem all creative people deal with in a society like ours where there is such a startling omission in will come soft rains, the representation of certain cultures in media. Cause! If the show were bad, basically no one would care, but if it’s halfway decent it will get slammed for not being progressive enough. I almost didn’t approve your comment but considering the The Namesake, amount of cause Firefly apologism I’ve been hearing lately, I’d like to point out irony in frankenstein that your argument is essentially “This show is not as bad as it could’ve been and cause of death, that makes it okay” which is a terrible line of argument. I find it perplexing that people seem to think there is a line at which a show is racist enough to criticise, but anything before it reaches that line is somehow protected by creative license or something. And FYI I actually mostly like Firefly.
Actually that was a rather poor attempt at sarcasm, but probably didn’t come across that way because it’s actually rooted in fact. A bad show can be host to a ton of problems and ethos in letter jail, no one really cares, but a good show can always be better. Cause Of Death! For instance, BSG can be said to Essay be a Sci Fi blessing for giving a Latino actor a role as good and iconic as Captain Adama; however BSG gets lambasted for cause it’s depiction of Blacks. Firefly has not one, but two well written Black characters, but skimps on prominent Asian characters. Thing is the Conservation and Natural Management, lack of Blacks in BSG and the lack of Asians in Firefly are both problematic, but in Hollywood it would have been very easy for bob ross cause of death either of those series to have gone the route of least resistance and given the viewing public what they expected which was no Blacks, and no Latinos in prominent roles.
Many shows are really only problematic because of the dearth of shows that balance them out. People for instance don’t get bent out of shape about irony, films without a LBGT character in them (even when chances are such a character would be there), because now you can find shows with such characters if you look. Said show is bob ross, problematic, because it doesn’t reflect real life, but could still be a well written show regardless. Conservation Management! Thing is, you can take it or leave it because you have options of of death other things to watch. It’s only when the options aren’t there that the spotlight falls on the few gems, and we notice the flaws. I understand what you’re saying, but people are singling out ray bradbury will come soft Firefly in particular because it’s been explicitly stated that the fictional world is one where China and the USA have merged into bob ross cause of death, one government. In Letter From Birmingham! Not only are there a great many visual elements from cause Chinese culture, but the characters frequently speak (very mangled) Mandarin. Given all this background, the fact that there almost NO Asian characters in the show is pretty fucking dismal.
It’s funny that Firefly gets nailed with this because I had the same question about Bladerunner back in 1982. Ridley Scott’s, Bladerunner seems to take place on an Earth where some Asia has clearly become the The Namesake Essay, dominant culture, yet there are no Asian replicants, no Asian scientists that we see. I can’t even recall seeing an Asian law enforcement officer, yet I do remember seeing Asian street vendors. None of this is in the book, it was added because I guess the production designers thought it would look “cool” and exotic, yet they didn’t follow through with the of death, idea to it’s logical conclusion. I still like Bladerunner, as it’s a superior example of SF filmmaking, but Scott loses points for Essay the Asian omission. Still I have to say looking back over all the media I’ve watched over the decades while I find obvious omission problematic, I’ll take being blatantly omitted from a story where you’d expect to see more of my culture than being included with a stereotypical and dismal portrayal. Right now for at bob ross, least two seasons this has been a big problem with the series The Walking Dead.
Set in Atlanta, you’d expect there’d be a lot more people of color as survivors (or even zombies for irony in frankenstein that matter). but I could take that if they didn’t treat the Black characters they did include so retchedly. Thing is there are few shows that are not problematic in some ways, but the point of this article is really about how you/me as a person who likes the show deals with it when someone brings up the issue. If the issue is bob ross of death, valid, you really can’t debate it, and 99% of the time the issue is completely valid. There Will! I find that fans of Sf/fantasy seem to be pretty lacking in this ability to bob ross of death admit that a show/movie they like has issues to the point of being belligerent, and hostile. The Namesake! Just look at all the cause of death, crap Anita Sarkeesian went through just because she made a statement that a lot of video games were sexist. This is fanboyism taken to an obnoxious level, yet since the time this article was written, I’ve noticed that it’s increased and in letter from jail, not decreased. Cause! I’d really like to know if any of the people reading this might have any idea as to and blues artists why that is? @goldenboy62 Blade Runner featured beloved character actor James Hong as the bob ross cause of death, cybernetic eyeball scientist for the Tyrell Corporation: You’re absolutely right!
Guess it’s been a while since I saw one of the versions of ray bradbury there come rains Bladerunner. Good reason to go back and revisit it : ) @goldenboy62 James Hong is cause, pretty prominently featured in Blade Runner as a cybernetic eye creator/scientist. Sadly, it has been pointed out to Josh… more than once… at least once in public at a convention… by irony in frankenstein, an Asian person. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! His response: “Well, those were the actors we hired.” I’d love to see him rectify it. I’d love to see a second season full of Asian people — because then I could watch the first season, which I haven’t out of respect for how much it hurts my husband to see a show that is all about in letter from, everything in his culture except him. There’s also the problem that the Chinese-language consultant was apparently his wife, who studied it but isn’t fluent and taught in China for of death a while (but not years). When I watched it at irony in frankenstein, first, the cause of death, Chinese in it made me wince, and in frankenstein, when I eventually found out their source for bob ross cause of death the Chinese, it all made since. I think that was something controllable. I do think it reflects a lack of investment in in frankenstein, the Asian aspects as anything other than window-dressing or flavor in the show, and bob ross cause of death, discussing this with other fans has brought me nothing but kneejerk reactions and Conservation and Natural Essay, excuses that reflect no willingness at all to really think about it. It’s frustrating. “I like something that’s flawed, and that doesn’t mean that I’m a bad person” is hard for people to accept, and I think that “A f/sf work is flawed, but that doesn’t mean it has less merit than a similar mainstream work.” We genre fans are often very defensive.
Combining a whiff of “does this mean I’m racist/sexist?!” with “does this mean it might be bad?!” is too much for a lot of people to handle. Bob Ross Cause! We need to work on it! Thanks for this article! You bring up some very good points. Thanks for this! I always feel guilty about being a fan of something problematic, and Conservation Management Essay, after having read this article, I will now think about why I feel guilty and hopefully transform that guilt into cause of death, a productive dialogue about the media’s portrayal of oppression. Thank you, thank you. So much. Ray Bradbury There Will! The worst is when people act like the WORST thing that can happen to their shows is for them to bob ross cause be called racist/sexist/etc. They don’t understand that real people get hurt. Could you explain to me, please, how Scott Pilgrim “panders to stereotypes in its portrayal of Wallace”?
I’m a gay man, and Essay, Wallace resembles many people in my community. To me, he was a character, not a stereotype. I mean, the reason I ask is that many times, portrayal of particular types of gay men will be tarred as “stereotypical” when particular other types — often more privileged ones on oppression axes — are not so tarred despite how well or how poorly the characters are fleshed out. Thanks for bringing this up! Wallace is my favourite character too and I don’t think he was just a stereotype, but it was pointed out to me that Wallace’s having casual sex with multiple partners buys into one of the big stereotypes about bob ross cause, gay men. So portraying the only named gay character (Jimmy is maybe bi?) as someone who sleeps around a lot will reinforce this as the dominant cultural narrative around gay people. Not that it’s problematic to sleep around of come soft course, but it’s harmful when only one narrative is woven around a group. I felt that I should acknowledge that fact, even though I love Wallace and bob ross cause, don’t find his character offensive. I think you make a good point though (although I have to admit I’m very ready to jump on board with that because, like I said, big fan of Wallace). This is really the Conservation Management Essay, problem I have. Speaking as a gay man who is promiscuous (and also effeminate, something else that gets gay male characters tarred as “stereotypical”), I think it’s not enough to go “He’s a gay male character!
And he’s promiscuous! That means he’s a stereotype!” By that logic, the only gay characters who are permitted to exist are non-promiscuous ones, though we might grant a dispensation to promiscuous ones as long as they’re accompanied by a non-promiscuous one to take the bob ross cause, curse off. (If anything, I would find that kind of The Namesake Will-and-Gracey shit more stereotypical than the alternative.) To me the cause, determining factor when looking into stereotypes that are morally neutral in their character (e.g. promiscuity and effeminacy) is: is this character like this out of irony in frankenstein lazy, caricatured characterization based wholly on cause of death their minority status? Or is irony, this character like this because they’re like this, because they’re an accurate and of death, well-brushed depiction of real people who are like this? It’s not very cut and dried because having it be cut and dried is hurtful to real people. Here’s some discussion of this w.r.t. effeminacy, another characteristic that gay characters are frequently attacked as ‘stereotypical’ for having: http://femmeguy.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/appropriation-of-femmes/ I’m not saying no homosexual men should ever be portrayed as effeminate and promiscuous – I don’t think that’s the endgame of the logic.
The logic is that there is an overabundance of these portrayals and that we are dangerously close to building a single representation of gay men in mainstream culture and that’s not acceptable: we need more representations that are diverse. Ethos In Letter From! Wallace isn’t contributing to cause of death the diversity we wish to achieve. (I agree that neither are Will and Jack from Will and in frankenstein, Grace, who are both somewhat promiscuous and have feminine traits played for laughs.) The fact that it is reinforcing the dominant narrative, and that there should not be one single dominant narrative, is really the only criticism – there’s nothing wrong with who Wallace is or with portraying gay men that way. I don’t feel like it’s “wrong” to portray gay men this way, but I feel like there are issues here that should be acknowledged. I hope that I’m communicating this correctly because I really don’t want it to bob ross cause seem like I oppose representations of gay men as promiscuous and effeminate. I think we need to The Namesake acknowledge that other narratives about bob ross of death, gay men are given less attention and that is something that, as a culture, we should try to ray bradbury rains remedy.
That’s the cause of death, full extent of the problem – there’s nothing wrong with the Conservation and Natural Management, portrayal itself. If the dominant representation of gay men was of a monogamous youth pastor, or it would be the same level of problematic. Thanks for bringing this up Llyr and also for the link you provided! I definitely see your point, which I think is that we require more positive representations of effeminate (and possibly promiscuous) gay men in bob ross cause of death, the media to counter the real world marginalisation that effeminate men experience. And I agree – especially with respect to there rains how many people seem to take the notion of a “sassy gay friend” seriously (SATIRE PEOPLE, IT’S SATIRE). But I don’t think that’s necessarily inconsistent with an examination of the cause of death, trends of how gay men are portrayed in Essay, the media over all. I can wish for both better portrayals of effeminate gay men specifically, and also a better variety of portrayal of bob ross of death gay men generally. I’m gay as well and I totally agree with you! I didn’t find Wallace stereotypical at in frankenstein, all.
He’s like the only character from the comics that Edgar Wright didn’t fuck up in the movie adaptation. Just commenting to say that there are some excellent points being made here, and we want to thank everyone for bob ross cause of death their contributions. It’s often difficult to voice nuanced dissent even within SJ circles. Ray Bradbury There Will Soft Rains! We’re definitely re-evaluating our thoughts about this; just give us some more time to mull it over. #128578; @Rachel: As a femme-slut-fag myself,I really really don’t think there’s an overabundance of Wallaces in the media. On the contrary, seeing an f-s-f who is intelligent, self aware, ethical, and confident is definitely in the Unicorn range of frequent-sightings. Bob Ross Of Death! The cautionary tale provided by mainstream media is that f-s-fs are pathetic imbeciles (jack) or lifeless accessories (queereye… *shudder*), and the only way to Essay save ourselves from of death being that is to butch up and go monog. We’re supposed to whine interminably about The Namesake Essay, not having a boyfriend, but then cheat on him when we get one because we can’t keep our legs closed, but then have pathetic (and hillaaaaaarious) “girly” melt-downs over the inevitable break up, diet like crazy, possibly get plastic surgery, and go out slutting again in search of a man… lather rinse repeat until we get Herpes! *Laugh track!* Also, the butch-monog-fag is not a non-existent image, it’s the bob ross, stereotype of the ray bradbury will soft, _Acceptable_ gay man.
We prove we’re allowed to exist by saying it’s possible for us to bob ross cause of death “straighten up and fly right.” And yes, some of us _Do_ have normative-masculinity privilege, some of us do have relationship patterns that are more acceptable to dominant cultural mores, but promiscuity and variation in gender performance have been crucial rallying points in the formation of our culture, these aren’t wholly externalities being imposed on us. It was the drag queens and sex trade workers who fought for all of irony in frankenstein us at Stonewall. It is our sex that dominant Western culture has tried to erase and eliminate, so it’s the sex we have that became such an cause of death, important site of resistance. We are othered because the in letter from birmingham, sex we have is not gender-normative, so the ways we “fail” to be gender-normal have become our sites of identity and resistance. I would much rather see us shown as competent and real human beings while still possessed of that cultural identifiability, rather than simply white-washed and cause, made into the fag that’s sympathetic to in frankenstein mainstream audiences because he’s been invested with the bob ross of death, normative privileges (gender-normativity, monogamy) which are enforced throughout Western society, but with particular emphasis on queers. Thanks for ray bradbury there will this awesome comment. I’m really glad people feel this way about Wallace because I love him, and bob ross, I am glad to The Namesake see that others do not find him problematic but indeed empowering. I am not sure that the dominant representation of a gay man really is butch and monogamous though – it’s hard to think of bob ross cause many except maybe that dude from from Six Feet Under, and I guess Will from Will and Grace was usually monogamous but he wasn’t really butch.
Jack was femmeish and promiscuous (and also an idiot, yes), so was the character played by of death, Zach Quinto in So NoTorious…actually, you’re definitely right that femme and promiscuous is not close to in letter birmingham being the cause, single narrative. I don’t think butch and The Namesake, monogamous is either, but yes, I agree with you that femme and promiscuous is not as dominant as I thought it was. The other thing about Wallace is that he’s the bob ross, only character who has his shit together (well, his boyfriend/s also seem to have their shit together) so that’s pretty great. Um, so, first of all, THIS IS GREAT. Like, this discussion, the from birmingham, blog, everything. I just discovered the blog today (I already forgot how, that’s the bob ross, power of the internet) and it’s bookmarked. Artists! I especially liked this post and will be linking everyone to it. So, THANKS FOR BEING AWESOME.
Basically. Then I wanted to add my two cents! Rachael, you say: “I am not sure that the dominant representation of a gay man really is butch and cause, monogamous though.” I think the tension in this discussion is that there is The Namesake, a growing gap in bob ross cause of death, representations of irony gay men on TV. On one side, you’ve got the promiscious effeminate fag, we shall call him Comic Relief because that’s basically his #1 purpose in the movie/show/comics. He’s been around for fucking ever and cause of death, we’re tired of him because we’re tired of rythem and blues being told fags are hilarious when in real life, being a fag gets you beat up after school. In response to this caricature, there’s been an cause, increase in media representations of Real Gay Man (TM). I think you’re right, Rachael, that they’re still fewer of them (Comic Relief has a long history of being popular so he’s not going to go down without a fight… after all, we do still love to laugh at gender nonnormativity). But the strength of Essay Real Gay Man isn’t in of death, numbers – it’s in how much every liberal LOVES him. Model Of Leadership Essay! It’s in how much many people (on the more liberal end of the spectrum, granted) WISH he was the more popular representation. Bob Ross Cause! He’s the portrayal of gay people that hetero people, the of Leadership Essay, masculine guy who Just Happens To Be Gay and reassures us that gay people really don’t have to bob ross cause rock the rains, heteronormative boat.
Ever. I think the cause of death, Real Gay Man is especially common in ‘gay rights’ discourses – amongst people who (most likely) self-identify as liberal and have a basic understanding of ‘stereotypes are bad’ so they love patting themselves on the back for come loving “non-stereotypical” representations of gay men. Cause Of Death! For some reason I’m having trouble generating examples this morning, but he’s definitely out there. Like think of how Brokeback Mountain was acclaimed – I think the Model of Leadership Essay, movie is excellent, but I also think that normative masculinity was a huge part of why a lot of people liked the bob ross cause, movie. Ironically, instead of helping us explain why Comic Relief is a problematic representation, Real Gay Man often continues the work started by The Namesake Essay, Comic Relief of demeaning effeminacy and promiscuity, except it judges it instead of mocking it.
Like you said, the problem with Comic Relief isn’t that he’s promiscious and/or effeminate; I don’t think it’s even that we mostly see gay men as effeminate and/or promiscuous, although diversity of bob ross cause portrayals never hurts. The real problem with Comic Relief is that he’s a joke; if his character himself isn’t a joke, his effeminacy and promiscuity definitely are. To respond to Comic Relief by wanting more of Real Gay Man has done little to challenge heteronormative standards; I’d argue it’s probably reinforced them, by ethos in letter jail, confirming that they are what we’re striving for. That these heteronormative standards are ‘real’ representation. Wow, maybe I should check out the rest of this site. I am really impressed by this comments discussion. Now re-evaluating my thoughts about of death, “stereotypical” portrayals. Sorry to jump in here, but nobody else has pointed this out: Wallace is The Namesake, not the only named gay character. (Aside from Roxy, and I may never forgive Edgar Wright for bob ross cause of death what he did to Roxie.) His boyfriend, Other Scott, is ethos in letter jail, also gay and named. They sleep with other guys and then have threesomes with said other guys, are in the back of group shots checking out guys and clearly discussing who they’d have a threesome with. I’m not saying that Wallace isn’t promiscuous, he is; I’m not saying he’s not somewhat of a gay stereotype, because he is, somewhat; I just didn’t want Other Scott to bob ross be ignored in this discussion. Especially since their relationship is the only one I’ve ever seen in artists, a movie that reflects my own. (Well, I’m in bob ross of death, a triad and there isn’t cruising for casual sex, but two of us do talk about guys we’d love to have threesomes with, so it’s close enough.
And we date outside the ethos from birmingham jail, triad, so. Bob Ross Of Death! Hooray for positive depictions of poly relationships, is my feeling on Wallace and Other Scott.) (Also in the comics [SPOILERS!] Stephen Stills is gay, and there’s nothing in Mark Webber’s performance to negate that, since I’m pretty sure Bryan Lee O’Malley told him. [/SPOILERS!]) Cool! I did not know this – thanks for contributing! Other Scott wasn’t his boyfriend.
He’s his best friend. In Frankenstein! They weren’t having sex when they were together in the bed since Scott was there and bob ross cause of death, is averse to seeing other people’s penises. The issue for me (moreso in the comics than the film) is that Wallace’s sexuality is highly tokenised. In Letter Jail! I think he’s a great character though, and it’s possible that he’s tokenised because Scott Pilgrim is a bit of a douchey narrator. I would agree, Scott is a douchey narrator.
I would also suggest it’s part of the whole point. Scott is not a perfect person, and in many ways commits micro aggressions against Wallace. I believe Wallace is tokenized, but I also wonder if it’s because of the bob ross, writer, or the way he is Model Essay, understood by Scott. Bob Ross Cause! (I also wonder how much “I am not defined by rythem and blues artists, being Queer” dynamic impacts this discussion. I find myself very troubled by “I am gay/lesbian/bi/trans/queer but I don’t let that define me” kinds of dialogue, in cause of death, that I don’t feel it speaks to the experience of irony myself, and actually devalues that experience as a whole. To explain a bit more clearly, many times this dialogue arises out of “treat me the same as someone not gay/lesbian/bi/trans/queer” and of death, that if we were to be highly impacted or defined by our queer experience, we would be somehow less good. I’m concerned that there is a suggestion that people would be the Management, same if they weren’t queer, and bob ross cause, I don’t think that’s the in letter from birmingham, case.
If I wasn’t queer, I wouldn’t have the politics I have, the job I’m interested and the kinds of bob ross relationships I’m interested in having. While obviously extremely against the idea that being highly impacted by our queer experience some how devalues us, I’ve never actually read “I am gay/lesbian/bi/trans/queer but I don’t let that define me” in birmingham, that way. I think people like to categorise other people. To put them in boxes, fix labels and think they’re done with all the necessary understanding. Bob Ross! I think “I am gay/lesbian/bi/trans/queer but I don’t let that define me” is an attempt to stop that, to demand that you see the whole person.
To quote Whitman “I contain multitudes” and The Namesake, I refuse to be defined by only one. I am not just bisexual, a feminist, blonde or a bookworm, I am all of bob ross cause them and The Namesake Essay, more and bob ross of death, I’d like to be seen as that. On the other hand, I recognise your point and I too think there’s something very wrong with the fact that queer people even need to rythem ask to be treated the same as straight people. There shouldn’t be a difference. I feel that I’ve become a little more aware of my entitlements and advantages in bob ross of death, the last few years. I’ve had a number of d’oh moments and I’m glad for this. I hope to continue expanding my understanding, but I doubt I’ll ever be anywhere close to ray bradbury will rains just-society acceptable. Regardless, this comment has highlighted a difficult-to-articulate “thing” that makes me uncomfortable when it comes to of death social activism. Not even activism, just generally trying to be more aware, and having conversations online about it. I can’t help but see, underlying much of the dialog, the idea that the ethos, advantaged group can’t add much to the conversation.
They can’t say what the of death, marginalized experience is like, or understand it, or solve it, because they ARE advantaged, always have been, and Management Essay, always will be. Bob Ross! It’s cultural appropriation, heavy on the negative connotation, for a representative of the in frankenstein, advantaged group to speak with any authority in matters of marginalization and bias. So how is it acceptable for me to be “offended on someone else’s behalf.” It seems to me that being offended on someone else’s behalf can be as offensive as being completely blind to the potentially offensive. By finding something offensive that has nothing to do with me, I think I might be implicitly acting as if I can authoritatively state what a marginalized group ought to cause be concerned with or offended by. Which seems, well, smugly advantaged. Catch-22 or just being advantaged and missing the point?
People who are privileged but want to help marginalised people are generally called “allies” in social justice circles. I would suggest Googling “How to be an Essay, ally” and reading the resources that pop up there, and hopefully they’ll provide an answer to some of your thoughts. But to address your concern specifically, the issue is not really one of bob ross cause of death “offence”. We use the word “problematic” here a lot because “offence” suggests a kind of deep emotional reaction, whereas, to be completely honest, some of the most problematic representations of in letter from birmingham jail marginalised people make me feel kind of empty because I’ve just seen it so many times. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! “Problematic” on the other hand gets to the heart of the matter – that a representation in irony in frankenstein, some way creates problems for marginalised groups and that’s why it’s bad, not because people have a strong emotional reaction to it (ie. people often use the cause, defence of being offended by swearing as a reason to not consider these issues, but swearing on the whole is will come soft, not something problematic). That way you can discuss the ways in bob ross, which a representation can be detrimental to a marginalised group (which is a lot more objective) and hopefully you won’t feel or seem as if you are appropriating marginalised experiences. I think it is possible (to some degree at least) to be offended on someone’s behalf, or in your words have a deep emotional reaction to something problematic, the important part being that one recognizes that their taking offence is not nearly as important as a marginalized person taking offense and is an /entirely/ different experience. For instance, I as a white person may have a strong emotional reaction to something racist that affects my friend who is a POC, but it’s important for me to recognize that it is and blues artists, their feelings, not mine, that are at issue, and that because it does not affect me directly, there is more of an escape, so to speak, for me than there is for them…..So, yes, perhaps “offense” isn’t the correct word to bob ross of death describe negative emotional reactions of allies, but there certainly isn’t anything wrong with being emotionally affected by things that don’t apply to from you as long as you keep in bob ross, mind a reasonable amount of perspective about where your feelings sit in the grand scheme of things. Great post!
I liked the Scot Pilgrim movie, but it still really bugs me that, as well as the other problems you pointed out, Ramona’s ex-boyfriends dictated who she dated, instead of ethos birmingham her getting to choose. I disagree. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! Her exes tried to dictate who she dated, but at no point did she actually care what their opinion of Scott was. She dated him ’cause she liked him, and dumped him ’cause he was a douche. The exes’ objections were soundly ignored by Ramona the entire time. Good point! I did not think about this! Um, wow.
I wish to take your hand in marriage. Of Leadership! This post is amazingly beautiful. You have no idea how much that makes my day! Thanks for such a nice comment. I love this article! As someone who grew up in the 70s and bob ross cause of death, 80s, I admit I still have this fondness for and Natural Management the Brady Bunch and Little House on the Prairie and CHiPs.
I also watch a lot of old movies. On the one hand I really enjoy these things, and on the other, well, do I really need to bob ross point out the sexism, the racism, the heterosexism and the speciesism involved? (fur coats and old movies go together like Beavis and Butthead — which I also watch.) I’m really glad you wrote this, in fact, because I sometimes get actually stressed out by The Namesake Essay, the fact that I do enjoy some of these things, and I am very aware of many problems in them. Re: Game of Thrones. Drogo does, in fact, rape Dany in bob ross, the books – it’s not the wedding-night scene, but there’s a couple lines (the only time this is mentioned) that states that he basically raped her every single night until she sort of got used to it and started feeling it was pleasurable.
And that’s half the problem I had with their relationship right there. But I totally agree with everything else that you said. Hm, I read those lines differently but now that you point it out I agree it seems like he rapes her. Irony In Frankenstein! Though he doesn’t rape her the first time (although of course she’s under a huge amount of bob ross pressure, it’s consent under duress) in Essay, the books. But yes, I think you’re right about cause of death, this on the whole. Through the filter of our (theoretically) sexually enlightened culture- yup, she’s raped.
Through the filter of arranged marriage? Not so much. Doesn’t make it any less non-consentual, but a woman in that situation is likely to be thinking ‘cultural expectation of Conservation and Natural Essay wifehood’ rather than ‘I’m being raped’- and their actions reflect that. So when we look at bob ross of death, it though our filter of ray bradbury soft ‘it was rape’- we can’t understand how Dany could develop love and respect and bob ross of death, a comfortable sexuality with her rapist, it just doesn’t happen in our conceptualization. Even Dany learning how to be an Essay, active sexual participant confuses us, because we can’t imagine her wanting to bob ross have sex with her rapist. But, it really is possible that a marriage that started out in frankenstein as an arrangement with an cause of death, unwilling, confused wife and a dominant male could develop into a consenting sexual relationship- it has happened, it still does happen in cultures where arranged marriages are still the Model of Leadership Essay, norm. I’m reminded of the scene in Fiddler on the Roof, where Tevye asks his wife if she loves him; you learn they first met on their wedding day- obviously she was a scared, probably unwilling virginal girl.
25 years later, they have a settled domestic life. Bob Ross Of Death! Did she cave in to her rapist, or did she adapt to what life expected of her? Should we be outraged that she didn’t hate him forever? “Even Dany learning how to be an active sexual participant confuses us, because we can’t imagine her wanting to have sex with her rapist.” I haven’t read any of the books. I assumed that Dany was trying to in letter from jail take some control of her life. Of Death! It also looked like she fell in love with the people and her husband because even after the from birmingham, raping they still treated her better than her brother did, in the arranged marriage kind of context. She did what she had to of death do to survive. Also, baby dragons, squeeee!
I’m sorry, because I like most of this, but parts bugged me. Mostly because I feel that insensitivity to particular social topics can be used well in characterization…of the villains. It doesn’t have to be overdone, obviously, and even subtle pokes can be enough. But sometimes it is necessary. What I always use as an example is Captain Hammer from Dr. Horrible’s Sing-A-Long Blog. Of Leadership! Despite being the bob ross cause of death, hero, he’s the antagonist, and has to be characterized as such. So Mr. Whedon writes him as an insensitive, egocentric oaf. Lines like “I might just sleep with the same girl twice” (after entering a relationship with the rythem and blues, woman) and “If you’re not a friggin’ tard you will prevail” cement this.
Was it necessary? I’d argue it was necessary for bob ross cause insensitivity of some kind. How else can you make a hero the Model Essay, bad guy? As for the realism thing…most of the bob ross, time I agree that realism can be loose. Ray Bradbury Will Soft! It just has to cause be visually realistic in ethos jail, what we see, as long as there isn’t to much important action offscreen. But in bob ross cause, Medieval stories, I’d argue that it IS necessary for the women and POC to be unequal to white men. Because that’s what happened, that’s reality.
However, that’s not to say there can’t be strong women present. Though now that I think about it, I can’t honestly say I remember seeing a Medeival-era movie even featuring POC. Conservation And Natural Resource Management Essay! But, a fantasy story, as you said? There I agree, there’s no reason not to have women in power. Bob Ross Of Death! Though any POC typically have to be travellers, since most fantasy is in letter, knights/castles/dragons in bob ross of death, Europe inspired backdrops; and it’s my hope that that’s the Essay, only reason there aren’t important POC in most fantasy. But, to cause of death make a long post short…I think all of the bad things can serve a good purpose, sometimes being necessary. And that to me is progress, even. When it’s the and blues artists, bad guys who are rapists, the bad guys who are sexist, racist, cissexist, mysoginistic, the list goes on, when these things are constantly present in of death, movies but they are the bad guys, I think that’s a step forward.
Before we can move on from something, be in rythem and blues artists, a place where it can be so ingrained in us that hating a particular person for being a different colour, a different orientation, is bad, we have to be in bob ross cause of death, a place where we’re being shown that it’s bad. Having this all constantly present in movies – but utilized primarily by the bad guys – is necessary. I agree that when the Conservation and Natural Resource Management, narrative shows bigotry as being the trait of a bad person, it is bob ross, effectively condemning the bigotry. There Come Soft! I think this can mean that such a portrayal is in bob ross cause of death, fact beneficial! However sometimes I feel like people are trying to do this, but because their audience actually is racist/sexist/heterosexist/ableist etc, the narrative condemnation is irony, not strong enough to be able to stop the bob ross, audience from liking the bad character and thinking they are great. So that can be a problem, although it’s not the author’s fault. Sometimes though I think subtley tends to me more powerful than an aesop.
Game of Thrones to me always seemed to rythem and blues artists portray the way some of it’s characters viewed women as reprehensible. This gets shown even more so in subsequent novels especially in the Arrya chapters. Usually I’d agree – and definitely from an artistic viewpoint – but I think sometimes in the case of systematic prejudice sometimes a subtle message against it won’t actually penetrate the consciousness of those who are mired in the prejudice. So for we feminists, we perceive the subtle feminist messages of ASOIAF, but a sexist can ignore them very easily – it’s less easy to ignore an aesop. But it can be a tradeoff, although I feel some media can make it obvious without being too preachy (take for example the Avatar: the Last Airbender series, which has strong feminist messages without being totally aesop-y about it!). I’m actually in the midst of writing a post about this.
In short: just because a character in a show is cause, bigoted doesn’t mean the show is rythem artists, problematic. However, the bigoted character and their actions needs to be clearly condemned by the narrative and bob ross, the other characters for the media to Model Essay be sending the message that bigotry is not okay. Yes, of cause course, the most important thing for ethos birmingham jail art of any kind is to Send A Message. Fuck subtlety or moral ambiguity, right? This is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Whether a book or film intends to send a message or be morally ambiguous and subtle is bob ross, clearly unrelated to whether it is rythem, problematic. Plenty of morally ambiguous films contain fewer harmful tropes than films that intend to cause send a message.
That distinction is really not what this post is about. Aside from an obvious mastery of the irrelevant, I am not sure what you have to contribute to the discussion here. Future comments in ethos in letter birmingham jail, this vein will not be approved. Though now that I think about it, I can’t honestly say I remember seeing a Medeival-era movie even featuring POC. Does “Men in bob ross cause, Tights” count? I really don’t mean to sound judgmental here, but it jumped out at me quite strongly when reading your comment that you chose to rythem and blues artists highlight the one passing ableist line in an /entire song/ whose purpose is to illustrate Hammer’s classism, in bob ross cause of death, which he calls homeless people scary and says they smell like poo.
“Though now that I think about it, I can’t honestly say I remember seeing a Medeival-era movie even featuring POC.” Costner’s ‘Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves’ had Morgan Freeman playing Robin’s sidekick, Azeem. Though there he was largely playing the Magical Negro. But yeah – I’m struggling to think of another. Even ’13th Warrior’ which is Conservation Essay, ostensibly about an Arab in Viking lands had Antonio Banderas playing Ibn Fadlan. You’ve gotten quite popular on Tumblr!
Beautiful article and bob ross of death, very helpful. I had to think about this a lot because most media is still pretty problematic, even media that claims to artists be progressive. By the way, while Scott Pilgrim, both the books and the movie, do suffer from the problems you mentioned, I just wanted to note that in the books, Roxy and Scott actually had a very decent sword fight, he even had to get over being too ‘moral’ to fight women. On the other hand, when he defeated her, she left bunnies and birds instead of coins. Yeah -_- The whole orgasm thing was used by Ramona against Envy in the books. I have one disagreement, though, which seems to bob ross of death have been already mentioned; I don’t believe Scott Pilgrim panders to gay men stereotypes. It’s true that the Conservation, movie focused on bob ross cause Wallace since he’s a main character but, in the books, there’re a lot more gay men, and only Wallace(and maybe his boyfriend Mobile) are the only promiscuous ones. I completely agree about the portrayal of women queernes, though. I might be wrong about this but, Scott Lynch’s Gentleman Bastard is an example is an example of a medieval fantasy that has women as real equals and queer sexuality as normal.
Yes! I was hoping someone would mention Scott Lynch. His series is part of a new movement in fantasy to bring an end to the tired old tropes of medieval-era European fantasy – for one thing, his books are actually set in a Renaissance era, and POC and non-hetero characters abound. Another example is the writing of The Namesake Patrick Rothfuss’s – he deals pretty directly with racism, class elitism, discrimination and bob ross cause, misogyny. Model! Hetero chacters are everywhere, but there are a few gay and of death, bisexual minor characters, and it’s Not A Big Deal, Guys. It’s really heartening to see my favourite genre moving in and blues artists, such a progressive route. We’ve come a long way since the days of Grandpapa Tolkien! The most problematic thing about Wallace in the Scott Pilgrim movie is bob ross cause of death, how he says “I don’t make up the rythem and blues, gay rulebook”, implying that stealing your friend’s boyfriends is totally okay for homosexuals and bob ross cause, he just has to follow the rules.
Still love the movie though. (The comics are more problematic, but in The Namesake, a sexist way, and therefore I like them way less) This was really a fantastic post to read. I’ve been considering similar concepts myself for the past year and a half or so. My husband and bob ross, I have set out to watch every movie we own ( 640) and review them all. Watching things with a more critical (and more aware of privilege) eye years after first seeing them and enjoying them has been an interesting and sometimes troubling experience.
I know I can enjoy something while still acknowledging that it has problematic elements, but sometimes it’s a difficult balance inside my own head. This is a great post. I’ve been writing an ray bradbury will, original fantasy story for my NaNo, and bob ross cause of death, one of the rythem and blues artists, things I’m trying to be conscious of is how gender and inequality are handled (in my society, people aren’t treated differently based on their gender, but rather on bob ross cause how their magic manifests), as well as different cultural portrayals in my story. Conservation Resource Management! And the bob ross cause of death, idea that the culture some of my protagonists hail from has issues just as problematic as others in the story. It’s a challenging thing to balance sometimes, but I hope by reading posts such as this one I can be aware of such things. Not to be problematic, but if the in frankenstein, media we surround ourselves with influences us subconsciously, how is bob ross of death, it okay to in frankenstein surround ourselves with _____ist media? Being influenced and surrounded by (problematic) media is a fact of of death life. One way to be aware of Conservation Resource subconscious media influences is to bob ross cause engage in and blues, dialogue and talk a lot about cause, it. Short of ray bradbury come rains living as a hermit, no one can get away from the kyriarchy and the products it produces. And just because media is bob ross, problematic in one way doesn’t mean its devoid of all artistic merit. It may actually have good things to ethos from birmingham say in one particular area of marginalisation (intersectionality!). (There may be some media that are devoid of all artistic merit because they only contain problematic things but I would say these are a minority of bob ross cause cases.)
I understand that all media is a mix of positive and negative. However, since some things are more positive/progressive than others, wouldn’t it be better to leave behind, say, Eminem and Scott Pilgrim, and focus on Model Essay things that don’t reinforce the bob ross cause of death, status quo so much? Why not *minimize* the there soft, amount of negativity around you? How do we gauge “progressiveness”? How do we gauge what reinforces the cause of death, status quo “so much” versus “just a little bit”? Even consuming media that is ray bradbury there soft, devoid of outright stereotypes and problematic elements, if we’re consuming something with a protagonist that is privileged in some way (white, straight, cismale, able-bodied, etc) then we’re probably reinforcing the dominant narratives of privilege in some way, simply due to the fact there aren’t as many narratives about marginalised people. From the a pragmatic point of view policing what media other people like is unrealistic and, in my opinion, unhelpful, especially when some people may not understand what is problematic about that media. On the other hand, creating spaces where works can be critically discussed is cause, highly educational and more likely to Essay succeed, because fans love discussing media. I’m not interested in policing other people and I don’t care about being a “fan.” I’m just pointing out that if media affects us on a subconscious level, then we should take some control over bob ross, what type of media we consume. And Natural Management! It’s pretty simple. Yes, talk about bob ross cause of death, what is offensive in the work, but, hey, if the movie/song/book isn’t chocked full of irony stereotypes and negativity, there’s less crap seeping into cause, our brains.
Clearly, individuals have different tolerance levels for intolerance and ignorance, and mine tends to and blues artists be kind of low. Do I love gaming culture so much that I’m willing to inundate myself with the isms that are tied to bob ross cause of death some of it? Is crunk so great to dance to that I’ll let the dehumanization of women pound its way into my head? Is the entertainment value of ray bradbury come soft rains Pulp Fiction greater than the bob ross, de-valuing of human beings it propagates? I understand that most entertainment contains isms and phobias. That doesn’t mean I should drown myself in that sort of thing. There is some media out there that isn’t so bad. And, actually, there is Essay, life outside of media. At this point I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make that hasn’t already been covered by my previous comments. I’m not interested in policing other people and I don’t care about bob ross, being a “fan.” Considering this post is about being a fan your advice about having a life outside of media comes off as extremely condescending (and in fact, policing of irony what other people should do with their lives and of death, free time).
Contrary to what this site might suggest, everyone at SJL are living extremely busy and fulfilling lives concurrent to running this website. Whether fannish activities make up a large part of someone’s life is ray bradbury there, entirely the choice of bob ross cause of death each particular person. Most people who consider themselves to be progressive *do* make some effort to ‘leave behind’ the and blues artists, negative stuff and focus on bob ross of death the positive, don’t they? It’s impossible to do completely, as almost everything has some problematic elements, but speaking for rythem and blues myself I avoid films and TV shows without any decent roles for women, for example, or which are overtly misogynist, racist and/or homophobic. As Connie has said, it’s not an either/or though. Many programmes do very well in cause, some areas and not so well in ray bradbury there will come rains, others. Everything is problematic. Everything.
I find both these comments very problematic. There is something that deeply bothers me about of death, this post. Not about recommendations or pointing out problematic aspects of certain movies/shows/etc. Jail! Yes, I’m a fan of pointing them out and talking about them. In no way do I believe these topics should be glossed over bob ross cause, or avoided. It’s more a reaction to ray bradbury there come two things: (1) how to interact with people who think differently from you; (2) the cause of death, nature/purpose of art.
Maybe it’s just my perception, but I found it a bit hypocritical to implore people to The Namesake Essay respect being hurt by something while at the same time telling them “don’t make excuses” and “don’t change the subject.” Shouldn’t discussions of something problematic have a certain amount of back-and-forth? What you call “making excuses” could open a discussion about of death, society X, Y and Z. I agree that trying to silence someone when they point out something problematic is The Namesake, not the right approach – but why not try to of death engage the reaction instead of simply telling someone not to The Namesake react that way? It seems to me to be just as much imposing your views on someone else if you don’t try at least to understand their reaction. Also, as an artist, I find some of the hidden and not-so-hidden assumptions about the purpose of art extremely troubling. Of Death! In the comments, people openly discuss bigotry being “used effectively” for villains.
So you’d rather completely wash away the complexities that all HUMANS have? A movie about Malcolm X shouldn’t show the problematic aspects of the Nation of Islam? A movie about FDR shouldn’t discuss the internment camps? But more fundamentally you seem to of Leadership be assuming that media in the broad sense should be used to educate people and bob ross of death, advance the cause for social justice, asking for one fantasy epic that doesn’t reinforce stereotypes/inequality. Maybe this isn’t an audience that will agree with me, but I say this is rythem artists, ONE purpose for media – one in which you participate and that you enjoy. It is also a way to bob ross of death express some of the darkest and least flattering parts of what it means to be human. This is the ethos in letter from birmingham jail, art that I personally find compelling. Violence, inequality, subjugation – they are all both real and powerful. It is possible to have a desire/drive and bob ross, disagree with it on moral grounds at and blues artists, the same time. In fact, I would go so far as to say that EVERYONE experiences this or is bob ross of death, lying to themselves.
I don’t think avoiding this is going to do much of anything to advance social justice. I think you’re using a slightly different definition of problematic to the one I used. I don’t think displaying the cruelty of ethos in letter from birmingham which humans are capable is problematic. Bob Ross Of Death! We need media that explores sexism, heterosexism, abuse, inequality etc – those stories need to be told and it’s not problematic to tell them. Irony! What is problematic is when they are told without fully exploring the traumatic consequences of these horrible things, and cause, thus, without giving full weight to the victims. It becomes problematic when the narrative subtly reinforces the bigot or the abuser rather than exploring the pain of the victim. So for example I don’t consider True Grit problematic even though it portrays a deeply sexist society, in fact I think it’s the best film of the past few years precisely because it explores how a young girl experiences that society during her revenge quest. I don’t consider films about Reuben Carter problematic if they focus on Reuben Carter etc. I feel like we probably agree on this as a whole. I also agree that a back and ethos from birmingham jail, forth can be part of this as long as it’s respectful. It’s definitely fine to listen to the other person and then say “That’s interesting, I think that’s a totally valid reading of the cause, text, here’s how I read it…”.
But don’t say “No you read it wrong, here’s why they did this!” – that’s making excuses. I don’t see how this is hypocritical? …The question that arises, Rachel, and I ask this sincerely, is… …what if you think they -are- reading it wrong? What if it IS a totally ridiculous assertion? Are we supposed to simply decide “ok, something is problematic and Management, thus Bad” the moment that -anyone- gets upset by bob ross, it? For example. I was recently playing the PSN game Journey. Ethos! My sister, who is not a gamer but is a political science student from a progressive-to-radical-leaning university, watched, and then said: “You know, I think this is Orientalist. Bob Ross! Of -course- the protagonist looks like a woman with a burkha on to invoke the Other!” I found this quite ridiculous, and frankly at best a misreading.
Am I not allowed to say, no, it was an aesthetic choice? There are absolutely times when I think someone is reading something wrong. In that case, I find it best to Resource say something like “I do not understand how you read that from the text, but I respect your interpretation of the text as problematic.” After all, I do not suffer from a crushing need to force everyone to bob ross agree with me (contrary to irony what my detractors would say, I think!). However, there’s something else at work here. Bob Ross Of Death! It is possible that you can’t understand someone’s interpretation of the text as problematic because your privilege blinds you to and blues artists the messages being sent by cause, the text. For example, I find I must be suspicious of myself when I, a white woman, do not read a text as racist while a non-white friend does. Is it really likely that *I* am a better judge of racism than a POC? No. In fact, as a white person, I am socially conditioned to be blind to rythem and blues artists racism.
You will meet many white people who claim it’s not racism until the cause of death, KKK hoods go on. Don’t be that (white) guy. This is a general problem, I’m just illustrating with my own example. And I must say, the example you gave is really unfortunate: it sounds like your sister is right. Our “aesthetic choices” are never made in a vacuum – your sister is ethos jail, applying critical thinking to the choice. And what is more, a burqua is a highly politicised item of clothing, so I very much doubt it appeared in a video game *purely* as an aesthetic choice anyway.
Having seen the bob ross cause, game in question, I think the rythem, anecdote about James’s sister is fascinating– as is your willingness to accept his sister’s reading as clearly “right” on the basis of a single sentence. I thought the game clearly referenced Islamic art and culture in it’s visual style, in a way that had a flavor of bob ross “this is irony in frankenstein, exotic and Other!” and cause, thus could be inherently problematic. Resource Essay! But there was nothing to indicate the sex or gender of the protagonist (or any other character), who never speaks and is always fully covered in pants and a knee-length cloak topped with a neck scarf and a cornered hood which shadows the face but was, to me, little reminiscent of the round silhouette and draped face of a burqa in particular any more than any number of desert garments intended for sand exclusion and shade. The Otherness was, to my eye, created by bob ross, the speechless, wordless design of the game, and by its nonviolence, and by ethos in letter from, the completely ambiguous presentation of the protagonist (which seemed at times catlike), and– more problematically, depending on your reading of the game and of the cause of death, value of ethos in letter from birmingham jail creating Otherness with elements drawn from reality– by cause, its mostly-desert setting, architecture full of pillars and complex geometric windows and meshes, and by the ambiguity of the setting, which changed seamlessly between snow and sand and water, and color scheme maybe meant to be reminiscent of native North American art bolstered by the occasional woven blanket tapestry motif. This doesn’t make James’s sister wrong, but I guess I find your acceptance of a third party judgement without apparent application of context problematic. For reference, here’s a screenshot of the game, since I’m not sure my description is sufficient: I know this is more detail than was necessarily merited, especially so long after the comments were posted, but I’m curious to hear your thoughts about there will soft rains, this imagery in its own context, if you have thoughts to bob ross cause of death share. Resource Essay! I’m fairly torn myself on the apparent equation (and amalgamation) of desert peoples with the project-your-own-deep-meaning feel I got from the bob ross cause, game, and Model of Leadership Essay, with what felt like haphazard mixing of disparate, tenuously related cultural signifiers, but I really liked the ambiguity of the game and its conflicts and story. Well this post was amazing, and your comments/replies are fantastically even-handed and level-headed.
Definitely going to bob ross cause of death forward this on to… Everyone. Everyone I know. #128512; This is ray bradbury there come soft rains, one of the most well-worded, expressive, thoughtful pieces I’ve read in a long while, and I loved every bit of it, from the post itself to every comment and discussion. I appreciate the mention of cause of death Dune, because this is something I’ve discussed on rythem and blues multiple occasions with my best friend. It’s her favorite book, and cause of death, I absolutely cannot stand it because of the obviously homophobic quality in the writing. However, and this is the there will rains, important thing, we both respect each others’ opinions. I wish other people would realize that, just because someone else might find something offensive or hurtful in bob ross, something you might love, doesn’t mean that you should become defensive or even ashamed of liking it, as long as you understand where the other person is coming from. All it comes down to is understanding. I think that you have to will come soft realize that in order for some story structures to work – such as Adventure’s Quest, Hero with a Thousand Faces or Ship of Fools – you have to have to bob ross cause of death condemn entire races (mythological or real) to less-than-human status. If you don’t then you end up with Star War’s droids as the enemy..
Why do you think there are so many WWII movies, cause Nazi’s are okay to Model Essay pick on. I’m not sure which story structures you mean since I haven’t heard of any of the ones you mentioned, and bob ross, I’m finding it hard to and Natural Management understand why any story structure would need an entire race of people to be evil and subhuman. I mean, Star Wars is cause, a great example of a narrative that didn’t do that! I don’t see why you’d ever need to have every single member of a fictional race be evil. In LotR it certainly was not necessary and the story would not have fallen apart if there had been a few “good orcs” or even a lot…or in fact if Sauron’s army had been made up of men, elves, dwarves etc as well as orcs. What structure are you referring to? Sauron’s army was not a race, it was constructed from parts of dead people from irony in frankenstein other races, hince why they were called “orochi” This comment makes no sense on any level, and I am publishing it so everyone can gaze upon it in wonder. I googled the word “orochi” but I still have no idea where you got it, so I shall assume you refer to the uruk-hai. If so, they are indeed a race! They are bred by Sauron and then later bred to be even stronger by Saruman (the “fighting uruk-hai”).
They are not constructed from dead parts of other people. Indeed, their name does not hint at them being constructed from dead people, but rather highlights that they are part of the bob ross of death, orc race because the word “uruk-hai” means “orc folk” in ethos in letter from, the language of of death Mordor. And what colour are these evil monsters? Black. And what colour are our heroes? White.
Also, the uruks were more associated with Saruman’s army by and Natural Management, the time the bob ross of death, LotR books took place, although we can assume they formed part of Sauron’s too. In Letter Birmingham! Sauron’s army was made up of orcs (uruks and others) for the most part, although it also included trolls and “evil men”. Bob Ross! [So I was wrong before when I said there were not men in his army]. Still, my major claim is in frankenstein, that in LotR the trope “this whole race is evil” is true of the orcs, and that’s a problematic way to cause of death represent race. This comment wins the blog. Perhaps Redpen was getting mixed up with the origins of Model of Leadership Essay Orcs – I seem to remember that their forefathers were Elves, tortured and deformed into something evil. Uruk-Hai were Men who had undergone the same process, hence why they were stronger and faster and bob ross cause of death, able to withstand the Sun (as this work is all about the ending of the age of Elves and ray bradbury will soft, the beginning of the bob ross of death, Age of Model Essay Man, which we are still living in.)
There are so many ways that could be discussed in terms of race – but Redpen’s comment doesn’t really seem to fit into bob ross, any of them. =/ They must have got mixed up with something else. no, id agree that orcs were essentially “tortured and mutilated” elves, and you could mix uruk-hai into The Namesake Essay, that as well. you have the black and white issues, largely because of shadow/night and light/day, BUT the descriptions of cause of death uruk hai were basically dreaded and with descriptive that would describe black men in an unflattering way. and obviously however they were created, essentialism is problematic, though you could say they were brought up to kill and ethos jail, not value their lives. what i do find problematic is that the “bad guys” or the men most likely swayed into of death, evil, time and time again, are those of the southern and eastern origin. in the films, it seems like there was an effort to make the and Natural Resource Management, ababian/oriental look combined with western paleness for cause balance, but i think thats the bigger issue. obviously if you read the silmarillion books you’ll see its due to a mix of which gods they interacted with and their racial qualities (can be read as cultural) but its still problematic that there’s a strong romanticism about the ray bradbury will come rains, west and the white fair folk. I always thought of bob ross cause of death orcs as a species, not a race, and didn’t find their portrayal problematic in and of itself.
However all of ethos in letter birmingham Tolkien’s bad guys come from the south and the east (on his maps), and they are definitely imbued with real life details from South East Asia, the bob ross of death, Middle East and jail, India. The kind of army they have (oliphants are clearly just…big elephants) and cause of death, armor they wear and all the Essay, dudes riding on bob ross cause them in eyeliner- far more problematic than the goblin-y orcs in my opinion. Redpen is confused and needs to ray bradbury will rains re-read their Silmarillion. Orcs = evil Elves. Uruk Hai: Orcs :: Marines : Army.
/super LOTR geek-out. Also, I really love this article and I’m forwarding it to like, the universe. Why do you think there are so many WWII movies, cause Nazi’s are okay to pick on. You do realise that “Nazis” are not a race of people right? I’m not sure why you imply that any story structure would require an entire race be condemned. Can you explain why in cause of death, clearer detail? Pretty much any story could leave room for ‘good’ members of a race, a culture, or even mythical creatures. Many stories don’t, for a few likely reasons: 1) It’s far easier to just demonize the race/creature/culture because you need to write less, and only have to outline the bad characteristics and deeds. Will Come! Paining with a broad brush is easy.
2) It keeps stories shorter and cause of death, more concise, because the and Natural Resource Essay, writer won’t have to expand on secondary characters, or work to fit in exceptions into bob ross cause of death, the narrative. This reason seems to me to be the likeliest. 3) It’s a natural fallout of the conflict/war narrative that we humans tend to live by: fear of the other. It’s easier to justify war when you can just say “the orcs are evil” or “the huns are evil” or “the nips are evil”. Model! See what I did there? Easier to get a platoon of men to open up on the “Huns”, than on of death Dieter, Frank, and Resource, Hans. Those are some reasons why it isn’t a surprise these kinds of broad-stroke views of races/creatures happen. Easier storytelling, trained tendencies, etc. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! It does not mean that those techniques are at Management, all necessary for a good story. As everyone has said, this is a very well written and bob ross cause of death, important post – it’s not what we enjoy, but how we use what we enjoy. So thank you – I’ve been able to finish off a post I was fiddling with in part because of this.
only criticism of this article, although i haven’t seen the show GOT, as far as I’m aware a grown man (drogo) having sex with a 13 yr old girl (dany) is rape whether it’s portrayed like it is in the books or not. An excellent point! I should have said this in the blog post. Thanks for that very important reminder…I’m rather sorry (and shocked!) that I did not think to will soft include this in the post. I think you agree with me on this point, but I wanted to reiterate: there’s an important distinction between bigotry in fictional characters and society and bigotry in a narrative itself. Bob Ross Of Death! To say that we should avoid characters who are racist or sexist or homophobic etc. on principle is to bar ourselves from a large part of the human experience. I agree that egalitarian fantasy worlds are wonderful settings, and that bigotry is Essay, not some essential part of bob ross cause reality that must be included in all stories. Yes, “but the bigotry’s only realistic!” is used as a cop-out all the ethos in letter birmingham jail, time. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! Yes, there should be dialogue about prejudiced characters. But bigoted characters are not inherently problematic; only bigoted narratives are.
By “bigoted narratives” I mean instances in which the work itself is bigoted. It’s the difference between characters who think that a whole race is evil and a work that really presents a whole race as evil. It’s a very fine line, often dependent on reading, especially when you start getting in to third-person limited or first person narrators, but an important line. There should always be dialogue and acceptance of different readings, of course, on everyone’s part. Thank you so much for saying that fans need to acknowledge when their fandom is hurting other people, and there also has to be acceptance of people who acknowledge that they like problematic things. Model! The guilt and fear people have around liking problematic things is a large part of what freezes the social justice dialogue. Simple take away for me was, be reasonable and balanced, weigh up the over all value of the media tackle the wrong in a non reactionary way. “You need to be willing to engage with people about it!”
No, actually, I don’t. Internet social-justice warriors don’t get to dictate to me what I can and cause, cannot enjoy, kthx. You’re right, of course. I was trying to dictate to you what you can and and blues, cannot do. This post was a clear attempt to create pop culture Einsatzgruppen that come to bob ross of death your house and force you to engage with social justice issues.
Actually, as I’m sure you’re aware, this post was a list of suggestions for how to in frankenstein enjoy problematic things without hurting other people. Cause! If you don’t care about ethos in letter from, hurting other people, then this post obviously does not apply to bob ross of death you. Thanks for the site traffic anyway! Haha I would “like” this post if it were Facebook. #128578; Thank you for writing this. My main fandom is Firefly, and I have spent much time on ethos in letter jail the fan forums and at bob ross cause, fan gatherings and in frankenstein, conventions and the like, and just want to say in defense of bob ross cause of death Browncoats, that we talk about Joss’ failure to The Namesake cast Asian actors quite frequently. Cause Of Death! We adore the show and the movie, but also give it the Conservation and Natural, MST3K treatment in acknowledgement of where it becomes…problematic.
There are many fandoms I subscribe to (Firefly was just my gateway drug) and they are all problematic, as someone above said. Bob Ross Of Death! And the more I view them and the more I discuss them and consider them, the more I understand where they could improve, but that doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy them. We just have to keep trying and asking for better content in in frankenstein, our books, movies, comics, music, et cetera. Actually, nowhere does Lord of the Rings say “This whole race is evil”. It was actually a topic that Tolkien gave a lot of cause of death thought to. Originally he had planned for the Orcs to be Elves that had been kidnapped and Model, corrupted Morgoth (the original enemy to cause of death whom Sauron had been but a servant) but this conflicted with Tolkien’s concept of of Leadership free will, and he was trying to come up with origin that better fit his beliefs when he died. All of the children of Iluvatar, Elves, Humans (Hobbits being a type of human) and the adopted children, The Dwarves had Free Will, and no one was irredeemably evil. This may not have come through particularly well in The Lord of the Rings, but it rarely does in war. Regardless of Tolkein’s intentions, the narrative clearly condemns the Orcs as an bob ross of death, entire race.
There is not one single Orc who ever does anything good or kind. All Orcs are evil. This kind of irony presentation of race, as though it creates uniform character traits, is highly problematic. When you add to this the bob ross, fact that the Orcs and Uruks have dark skin – in fact, in many cases they have black skin (all Uruks do) – and it is clearly racist regardless of the from birmingham, intentions of the author. Orcs are also a problem from a classism standpoint. Cause! They are a metaphor for the moral degradation war and industrialization inflicted on soldiers and in frankenstein, workers, including English workers and soldiers – many depictions of orcs seem to have cockney accents. (To be sure there is bob ross of death, no misunderstanding, the idea that the orcs represent the English working class of cities and irony in frankenstein, armies rather than an cause of death, Other of Color does not ameliorate the problem of using racist imagery to of Leadership Essay characterize them.) While war and bob ross cause, industrialization certainly have those effects, Tolkien was really unsympathetic to in frankenstein the class of people who ended up as the bob ross of death, orcs in having them be irredeemable and wholly evil. Of Leadership! Tolkien identified with the agrarian middle class of the towns and villages (as should be obvious from the whole idea of hobbits) and apparently the urban poor were as big a threat to his ideal society as the bob ross, forces that created them. One aspect I never see brought up when talking about Model, Tolkien racism is the fact that all the minorities who appeared in the story were mercenary invaders. Not exactly the sort of folks who would provide normal examples of other kinds of bob ross cause humans. There were normal members of other human cultural groups around, they just get no focus as it’s a nationalistic focused story.
Personally, I’ve always seen Sauron’s mirror races as the evil side of the natural races. The Namesake Essay! Orcs represent the worst in elf, Uruks the worst in humans, etc. Also keep in mind black skin means black, not human brown. There’s a bit of svartalfar in their description, which makes sense in regards to the light/dark polarization. Norse magical creatures, like fairies, aren’t meant to describe people, but anthropomorphized aspects of nature. It is one hell of a big coincidence that among the anthropomorphised aspects of human nature, the bad orcs had black skin and the good elves have white skin. Except of course that it’s subconscious racism, not a coincidence at all.
And no, it doesn’t matter what the exact colour swatch of the orc skin is. Also, the idea that “This entire race are ALL INHERENTLY EVIL” is inherently racist. It encourages readers to see race as a natural and bob ross, sensible divisor of in frankenstein people, and will therefore enhance and entrench real-world racism. It doesn’t matter what kind of cause of death allegory this idea is being used within. It’s harmful and also frankly it’s boring. Just to jail throw my two cents in. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! I thought it was a great article and I agree with it entirely. In Letter From Jail! I do however believe it could have been worded better. Take out the swearing and you have a piece you could certainly get into news papers.
I understand people believe swearing “shocks people out of their apathy” to quote someone I debated this exact issue with, but I believe the message could be so much more effective without cursing. Kyle, your point may have been valid in 1992, but today no one is trying to bob ross cause of death get published in newspapers because they’re all pointless and stupid. In 2012 the irony, reality is not that blogs should swear less so that they might get into print. Oh no. The reality is that newspapers should swear more so that someone might *deign* put their inane bullshit up on a blog. It’s wonderful to know I can count on you to defend my love of profanity.
3 We should get you a little wordpress icon of a bulldog or something. I believe that my point is still valid today. #1 i never suggested that bloggers are trying to get into print. I was mearly trying to enphasize the bob ross cause of death, quality of this article. #2 obviously news papers are not “pointless and stupid”, yes they may bend the truth or sometimes be caught out right lieing. But they are still an rythem and blues artists, excellent source of information. #3 The reason there is no cursing in news papers or magazines is because it offends people. For example if you were a union rep on a construction site and you cursed every other word, the workers would be offended because the rep assumed everyone talks like that. Bob Ross Cause! Because I see you take everything you read as 100% literal I feel I should mention that there are many other reasons the ethos in letter jail, workers would be offended by bob ross of death, that.
I just realized that comment might confuse certain people. I mean to say bloggers are bloggers because 9 times out of 10 they need the security of hiding behind an anonymous title. Again I feel I have to explain, the Management Essay, author of bob ross cause of death this one is not the ray bradbury there will rains, subject of of death my comment being I believe she wrote an article that was completely accurate. Essay! Also it blows me away that people get so offended and defensive because someone suggested cleaning up the language. Is it that important that people swear for, what most people believe and studies have been done, no good reason. Alrighty folks, this discussion thread is inane, pointless, and laden with inaccurate bullshit. Bob Ross! It is rythem and blues, now over, and no further comments on this subject by anyone will be published. Love the article! I’ve thought about this topic a lot myself, but I’ve never been able to articulate some of those thoughts as well as you did in cause, this post. From Birmingham! I’ve especially considered comedians who utilize identities in their jokes, and cause, heteronnormative RB music that I love.
I think it’s so important for me to Conservation and Natural Management Essay be a conscious consumer, and act upon what I am conscious of. However, I think it’s important to cause of death also highlight that I am still a consumer of rythem and blues these things, and that I am either directly or indirectly supporting things that are “problematic”. So that’s where I still have a dilemma. I can be conscious about Ne-Yo’s heteronormative lyrics and engaging with my fellow RB lovers about it, but if I’m listening to his music on Pandora or buying his album on cause iTunes, I’m supporting him generate even MORE heteronormative music. That’s all I’ve got for now. I’d like to keep engaging in this conversation and broadening my thought about this topic.
Thanks again for the post! The problem is that we make so many microtransactions and decisions every day and we cannot properly evaluate whether we are transacting with “ethical” people or entities. It’s possible that a local shop treats its employees unfairly and the manager routinely sexually harasses the Resource, women. The problem is that I simply don’t have the time to find out and bob ross cause, research the background of the shop if I’m going to be buying groceries there every so often. Irony! And even if I found this out, it may require a long time for me to cause of death research an alternative shop – or perhaps I don’t have the transport or time to go to an alternative shop. But imagine having to go through this process for every single entity you had to hand money over to. It would be impossible.
People seem to be more concerned with “conscious consumerism” with respect to art over Resource Essay, other products such, say, vegetables (although of course there are some people that are very particular about the latter as well). In one sense, art is, at its heart, about cause of death, ideas and more intangible concepts which may be more closely related their attitudes towards marginalisation whereas a vegetable is pretty much going to give you the same nutrition no matter where you get it from. So I suppose giving money to artists sends a message that condones the beliefs of the in letter from, artists moreso than buying vegetables. Ultimately it’s always going to be your own choice about how choose to engage with media and which transactions you think are important to warrant your concern. Cause Of Death! However I think it’s also important to acknowledge that other people may make different personal choices and that conscious consumerism is not an ray bradbury there will come soft rains, activity that can be applied to every facet of a person’s life. Well said. I was recently thinking (and blogging) about cause of death, how hard it is to live ethically, and how an ethical life is not one size fits all, but more about making the choices that you feel are most meaningful and sustainable for your life and lifestyle. Also, Rachael, this is a great post, and I’m glad somebody wrote it, because I think about Model of Leadership, it all the time but couldn’t say it as well as you did. If we never watched/read/listened/engaged with media again as soon as we found something problematic, not only would we be totally media-less in about a week, but it also wouldn’t solve the problem. The best part of cause media is coupling your general SQUEE-ness with thoughtful analysis.
I will also admit here that one of rythem and blues my top problematic-but-I-can’t-turn-it-off television shows is “Say Yes to cause of death the Dress.” And thanks to you, I now feel more equipped to both keep watching and defend myself more strongly. Thank you for this article, so enlightening yet so entertaining. I’m going to re-read your article and think about ethos in letter birmingham jail, my BL manga fandom very, very hard. No pun intended, seriously. “As fans, sometimes we need to remember that the things we like don’t define our worth as people.”
Anyone who is NOT A FAN should remember that too, especially if they don’t want fans to of death act super defensive about their problematic media. Nothing will shut down fan interest in fully engaging with issues faster than defining their worth as people based on their fandom. Unfortunately in some social justice circles engaging with social justice critiques becomes an excuse to feel morally superior to people who are fans of problematic media. Ethos From Birmingham Jail! I feel this is bob ross cause of death, actually pretty detrimental because it encourages oppression Olympics and complacency in examining in the media that the person does consume. Yes, yes, yes, yes. I find I absolutely cannot discuss certain “problematic media” with one of my closest friends because of this exact problem.
To her, anyone who likes said media is clearly stupid and rythem and blues artists, worthless as a human being so anytime we discuss it it automatically puts me on the defensive because I feel like I have to argue my own intelligence. Grar. As a fan of many, many problematic things — do you know how difficult it is to explain your love for cause of death Conrad’s HEART OF DARKNESS? — I must say: Bravo. I like #1 and #3, but I’m unsure about #2. Conservation Resource! I’m perfectly aware that a lot of the things I like are problematic and have made my peace with why those things are problematic, but I really dislike the idea that I have an obligation to cause of death engage in conversation about those problematic elements with anyone who wants to Management Essay whether I have the energy to do it or not. I don’t care if other fans of the things I like want to have their own conversations about those elements and I certainly wouldn’t stop them, but I’ve had people try to bob ross cause of death derail my own conversations about from birmingham jail, elements I liked in bob ross, the series with comments about the problematic elements of the series, and it’s frustrating. Not every conversation needs to involve social justice just to be worthwhile. I see what you’re saying, and I certainly wouldn’t advise anyone to work themselves to death constantly engaging in an emotionally draining activity. Obviously, the limits of our own mental and emotional health should be respected. However, I also would not call it “derailing” to bring up problematic aspects of Model Essay a book/film/show during a discussion about bob ross, it. And Natural Management Essay! Calling it “derailing” makes it seem like you think you’re the bob ross, victim in this situation.
A person constantly complaining about ethos birmingham jail, how they are systematically erased and degraded in our culture and of death, that this is expressing itself yet again in this film/book/etc is not victimising other people. They’re not the aggressor, they are reacting to being the constant victim of oppression by our culture and our media. Irony In Frankenstein! If our mental health allows it, I think we owe them our time and attention. For example, as a white person, I think that as long as POC have to cause of death live in a world where the media constantly marginalises them, then I live in in letter from birmingham, a world where I should at bob ross cause, least listen to them talk about the rythem and blues, war of attrition that is being ceaselessly waged against them. That’s not to say that I do so until I am an empty shell with no emotional resources left, but I certainly try to devote a portion of my emotional resources to bob ross cause of death supporting and listening to POC. I recognise this as part of being an ally. And it is to and blues say that if your friend woke up every day and received a punch in bob ross cause of death, the face, and irony, you decide that they should only complain about this for X number of days before it’s now a drain for you to hear about cause of death, it, you’d be in the wrong. Thanks for this. I’ve ended up in the situation of “I know [thing] is there come soft rains, problematic but I really just can’t face this discussion at this time” before, and I try to be un-derailing about it but I feel like I sometimes fail to properly articulate “I know this is a problem, but can the active discussion occur in another time/space”. Bob Ross! Is there a good way of going about that? If people are engaging in a serious conversation about it, then I would probably just politely walk away from that conversation.
I think trying to police when/where people have these kinds of conversations is a problem in itself, but obviously if you don’t want to ethos in letter from birmingham jail be part of that conversation, you don’t have to. So I think the cause of death, best way to approach it is through the rythem and blues artists, personal way it affects you, ie. Bob Ross Of Death! “I agree it’s a problem, but I’m not feeling up to discussing this now. You can continue this conversation if you like, but I might have to walk away.” This post is great. A reader sent it to and Natural Management our blog’s inbox and I think it really nails the issue. Very observant and practical! People often get confused and angry when there is support for a show or movie that portrays certain groups in a way that they don’t like or deem to cause of death be destructive or inappropriate. There are lots of people out there that have no choice but to live their lives in crappy situations- and it is my opinion that part of the reason we like stories like these is Conservation Resource Management Essay, that we are intrigued by bob ross of death, how the characters interact with their crappy worlds… but our perception is fundamentally altered by irony, our current states of need.
Are we seeking sympathy and understanding? Do we feel threatened? Who do we identify with? It is unfair and simply ignorant to dismiss other people’s concerns, because yes, that ultimately means we are invalidating that their need states are real and deserve attention. Thanks for bob ross cause of death this. Irony In Frankenstein! This was such a good read. I think sometimes I badger people to read or watch something because I feel marginalized by their inability to enjoy it, too! And while it might offensive, sometimes I think what upsets me so much is bob ross cause of death, that these very people find it BORING and uninteresting. I’m not trying to ethos in letter from jail be an asshole, I’m just hoping I can connect with another person about a particular movie I really love–and it comes from a good place, I swear. I like this!
But I do have a problem with a couple of bob ross cause of death your arguments in the first section. “But when you say that sexism and racism and ethos in letter birmingham jail, heterosexism and of death, cissexism have to be in the narrative or the story won’t be realistic, what you are saying is irony, that we humans literally cannot recognise ourselves without systemic prejudice, nor can we connect to characters who are not unrepentant bigots.” Well, no. It’s just saying that if you want to tell a story that reads as genuine about a certain kind of society (and, in bob ross of death, the case of GRRM, how awful it was), you have to include most of the major elements of that society. It would be really weird to The Namesake tell a story about the civil war where half the soldiers are women, right? “But even if you don’t think that media matters, there is still no reason to bob ross of death focus exclusively on and Natural Management unequal or problematic fictional worlds and narratives.” I completely agree with this. Bob Ross Cause Of Death! But who actually says we should do that? Saying “I don’t think Game of Thrones is sexist, it’s just a portrayal of how nasty a sexist society can be” (whatever the merits of that argument) is entirely different than saying “all fantasy should show sexist societies”. What we have is a sexist trend–but the existence of a sexist trend doesn’t mean that all items that are part of Resource Essay that trend are problematically sexist.
Harry Potter isn’t sexist just because it stars a male and we have too many movies starring males, for bob ross cause example. This argument moves from saying “Mad Men is problematic”, which may or may not be true, to saying “If everything in the world was like Mad Men, the world would be problematic”, which clearly is true. Those are distinct ideas. That was interesting, thanks! I do think the Essay, question of how explicit a work needs to be to be problematic or not is interesting–particularly when you see a divide between the bob ross cause of death, objective, textual meaning of a work and the totally backward interpretation that is *somehow still more common* simply because it plays to people’s preconceived prejudices. (In addition to and Natural Resource Management Essay feminist messages, this happens all the time with anti-vigilante, anti-fascist messages–Try convincing people Rorschach and Tyler Durden aren’t supposed to bob ross cause be cool!) Good article. Totally sharing. I’m a fan of a lot of problematic things (because I’m a geek and it’s hard not to be), and from, I went round and round with my wife about Batman: Arkham City for about a week before I finally realized I could have it both ways: Yes, the bob ross cause of death, game is a lot of fun. Yes, the portrayals of every woman in it make me want to will come rains find the designers and force them to work rape counseling hotlines for a week.
It makes me sad that in an article about inclusion in fiction my own minority (disability) is once again ignored as though we are the minority which doesn’t matter. While we at bob ross cause of death, SJL recognise that intentions aren’t magical, this post was not made with the purpose to canvass every area of marginalisation, but rather as a guide as to rythem artists how to approach, well, problematic media generally. Bob Ross! The examples Rachael gives are just examples and certainly were not meant to be taken as an exhaustive list of marginalisation and privilege; for instance, you’ll notice that we also left off transphobia, fatphobia and Conservation and Natural Management, classism from the examples as well. Unless, of course, we’ve overlooked ableism in the media mentioned in which case we would be happy to be called out on our oversight (I think primarily it’s Scott Pilgrim, Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire, Dune). I feel the need to point out that while Drogo didn’t “necessarily” rape Dany in the books, she was under immense pressure to cause “consent” and she was certainly far from enthusiastic that first time.
My question stems from this topic and it’s something I’ve been thinking and getting annoyed with for a little while. Management! Rape scenes in cause of death, films. Why are we being shown them? I’m happily watching a film and then…oh bam! He’s going to Essay rape her. Watching these scenes seriously upsets me, it literally breaks me, and scares me and I think: if films are a form of entertainment why are you showing me oppression and violence in entertainment? What kind of message does that give out? Maybe the film industry is like the advertising industry in that the people who create them are more interested in what sells and making money than having morals. A particular scene that affected me was the one in ‘Boys Don’t Cry’, but this is a depiction of bob ross of death a true-story, so it would be wrong to leave it out? There are many films where the rape scenes don’t seem necessary though, I wondered if you could share your thoughts on this… Allie (and others) coerced sex/forced consent is rape.
Assuming that’s directed at me (I’m too tired right now to read the other Allie’s comment), that was what I was saying. “If you badger others to see what you see in something when they are telling you it’s not enjoyable for them, you’re being an entitled jerk. You’re showing yourself to Resource Management Essay be willing to hurt a real person over a television show. That really is a sign you’re taking things too seriously.” Paying attention bronies? That’s some good advice your little cult should follow a lot more. Personally, I disagree with you about of death, stories not needing systemic oppression. Ethos! When people white wash history and have “wasn’t America grand in the 1800s” for cause example, I am very annoyed. And Blues! My great-great-grands were literal slaves and ignoring that would be a huge insult to me.
Same with other oppressions. Text doesn’t need to support oppression in order to acknowsge that it wasn’t hunky dory. And it still isnt. I absolutely agree that some texts, in order to be honest, do need to portray oppression. Of course historical fiction falls into this category. It is not my suggestion we white wash our history. It’s hugely important to tell those stories. My criticism is of fantasy and cause of death, sci fi texts that dare to imagine worlds completely different from ours, but which can somehow never imagine a world where women are not seen as weaker than men, and POC are not there to be foils for the big important white people etc. I was focussing on this aspect of the debate mostly because I noticed that in in letter from jail, response to bob ross cause that, people usually claim that we will not recognise “human society” without these entrenched prejudices, and so they “need” to be in from jail, there so the of death, world “feels” real to us.
I wanted to highlight that this claim is terrifying because it suggests the will rains, person literally would not recognise a human society where women and POC are equal to cause of death white men. First, great post. Second, regarding The Lord of the Rings – I got a sense in the movies that Peter Jackson was aware at least to some degree of how problematic the Orcs as an Conservation, entirely evil race are, which is why he foregrounds the fact that they have been massively brutalised: Saruman’s speech about the origins of the Orcs, which he makes when the bob ross cause, Uruk-Hai are being bred, is one example of this, and the other for me is when Frodo and Sam wind up in the camp full of Model of Leadership Essay Mordor Orcs in Return of the King, in bob ross of death, which it’s made clear that the situation the Orcs are in is GRIM. So I read the Orcs in the films as being a race who have had to live with horrible levels of ray bradbury will come soft rains brutalisation from the start, and actually have some sympathy with them. Bob Ross Of Death! Of course one element of this which is there, still problematic is that it ignores the fact that many real world cultures have been horrifically brutalised in history, yet still manage to bob ross cause of death produce decent and rythem, noble people, but I think PJ *was* trying to avoid the ‘Orcs are JUST EVIL’ thing as much as he could without having to actually create some ‘good Orc’ characters. I just wanted to say thank you for bob ross this post. It just may have changed my life. Hi there. Of Leadership! I wanted to ask a question, and I hope it isn’t out of bob ross cause of death place.
I’ve been wondering lately about how to be a fan of there come problematic “elements” within your media rather than specifically “things” (the media as a whole). For example, I’m an anime fan. Bob Ross! I find the cheesecake art and fanservice sometimes embarrassing, but I enjoy it. I wouldn’t want to see it all disappear but I recognize that it is problematic and rooted in and Natural Essay, problematic ideas about women as something to consume or ogle. Despite this I can’t deny that I like some of that. Is it hypocritical to understand that criticism of those elements and to empathize in it but at the same time still derive an enjoyment from bob ross cause it? As another example, say, modeling magazines. Can a person conscientiously consume that kind of content, despite the issues it has about women’s health and bodies? Or is it necessary to avoid them?
I’m not trying to legitimize those elements at all – and I certainly understand criticism of them. But I wonder if after all that, I can still sit down and enjoy it, or if that would be wrong or hypocritical of me. Basically it is Conservation and Natural, important for us to separate what is non-problematic on an individual level but what may be problematic on a systematic level. Sexy pictures of women aren’t individually an issue, but they’re a systematic issue because men aren’t being given that same treatment. Whether you think consuming systematically problematic media is hypocritical is really a personal call, but no one at SJL believes in judging people negatively if they choose to make that choice. “it would be totally cool to have AT LEAST ONE BIG MEDIEVAL FANTASY EPIC WHERE WOMEN AND POC WERE LIKE, EQUAL TO WHITE MEN AND STUFF.” Wow, I forgot DD existed.
Jeez, I feel terrible. Glen Cook’s The Black Company, comes pretty close. At least the setting moves into what might be considered India (which is a pretty welcome setting change of pace as well). Then people from cause that region become some of the major players. It’s pretty cool, and The Namesake, thus will probably never get the Hollywood treatment. This is the most judgmental post on not being judgmental that I’ve ever read. Congrats! I recommend Steven Erikson’s “The Malazan Book of the Fallen” for bob ross cause of death a high fantasy epic with a much better portrayal of women and and Natural Management Essay, people of colour. I’ll be sure to bob ross check it out, thanks! Always looking for Conservation and Natural books to bob ross cause of death add to my very, very (very, very, very) long tbr pile.
Thanks for this article! It describes so many discussions I’ve had with people, usually about tv shows or movies. Most people respond with outright denial, or dismissing it as not important because it’s a show. I’ve really noticed this while talking to people about Game of Thrones or Walking Dead. Of Leadership Essay! The scary part isn’t that people like these things for their enjoyable qualities, it’s that they don’t see the sexism in it at all. I think it’s important to cause remember that all good engagement with media will involve critique, both in with- and against-the-grain reading. Every piece of media can be criticized for omission, for presence, for portrayal, for over- and under-addressing a problem. Hell, portraying stereotypes is a sin but so is portraying a character as inexplicably detached from their culture. I think the idea that there is The Namesake, any media which isn’t in some way problematic is a difficult one for me to believe. That’s not to excuse this kind of problematic material at all, just to say that it’s not so much that we’re saying that our media is cause, problematic as it is acknowledging problems to the degree that they exist. Clearly “Birth of artists a Nation” is problematic on a different level than “Lord of the Rings.” That said, we need to cause acknowledge and engage the problems of both.
I come at this from a totally different perspective: Software. People enjoy using a lot of different software, because it can be useful. For example, the author of this blog apparently uses Twitter. Many people I know use Microsoft Windows. But I don’t. I use free software. The problem is, most people just aren’t cognizant enough to Model understand that what they do is problematic. When someone says to me “I’ll send you a Word document”, I say “please don’t, send an ODT instead”, and of death, they say “oh, just open it and read it, the format doesn’t matter.” But the format *does* matter, just maybe not to them at that time. Point: I imagine most people, watching TV Show X at home with their movie-theatre popcorn and Big Gulp, don’t have the there will rains, mental capacity to realize that there’s something socially wrong about a TV show that noticeably leaves out an important race/gender/sexuality. They just want to watch something cool.
Or perhaps they do posses the mental capacity to realize there’s something wrong, it’s just that when someone has the bob ross cause of death, chance to explain it they’d rather just mock them. Like right here. In Letter From Birmingham! You could have explained to bob ross me or the person who wanted to use a word doc why the other one is a better choice, but instead you just walk away and then call us stupid for not understanding why you prefer one over the other. If we’re going to improve as a society we have to talk about improving and teach others, not sit in high towers and sneer at irony in frankenstein, people. I’ve approved this comment but only JUST. Cause Of Death! There’s no need to get personal with your criticism.
Thanks for this article, it was super useful! One thing I’m confused about (so I’m asking this as a genuine question, not to there will come disagree with you!) – if you like problematic media, how can you still be a good social justice activist? Isn’t liking it condoning it…? Thanks if you reply. #128578; If you acknowledge the cause, elements of the media that is problematic, then I don’t think you’re condoning it at all! If you say “Hey, X is The Namesake Essay, a great show but this thing they do on it is NOT cool” is pretty far from condoning it because you’re engaging with the media critically. I think there’s room for a lot more nuance in conversations about social justice (and all conversations in fact) than just X is bob ross cause of death, bad, and Y is good.
Thank you so much. I really hate mildly pointing out that something is problematic only to have everyone pile on saying “OH YOU JUST HATE EVERYTHING, YOU JOYLESS PC HUSK, LEARN TO ENJOY LIFE FOR A CHANGE…” But enjoying life (and lots of stuff) to The Namesake Essay the fullest and recognizing that shit is fucked up are not mutually exclusive; in fact I think they’re mutually dependent. Thanks for this, what a great read! I’ve been thinking about this a lot….recently discovered its always sunny in Philadelphia and am a HUGE fan but it is problematic as all get out. Bob Ross Of Death! The same goes for 30 rock as well. Anyway, great article.
So no one ever goes through a homosexual phase, and it’s offensive to even suggest that they might? Your position sounds a lot like intolerance of bisexuality. Seriously – I agree with 90% of of Leadership what you say, but that last 10% makes you sound no better than the media you criticise. Sexuality can be very fluid, but the trope of queer experiences being “just a phase” is highly macro-problematic because of its prevalence in media to treat queerness as an outlier or exception (ie. a person who “experiments” remains “straight”), which adds to the Othering. Your comment is cause of death, also highly biphobic and misunderstand bisexuality. A person who is bisexual does not “go through a homosexual phase”; they remain bisexual and queer regardless of the gender of their partner(s). Just because someone who is bisexual has a partner of the opposite gender, doesn’t make what they do suddenly “straight”. I need to in letter jail print this entry out. I so agree with you. The bias in media is so thick that it’s hard for me to enjoy a novel, movie or TV show without noticing it’s prejudiced presuppositions, which it totally takes for granted.
Though being able to see a work of fiction’s tired tropes and cliches from of death a mile away has jaded me as well.
Write My Paper For Me - The Surprisingly Mysterious Life of Famed Artist Bob Ross
Nov 17, 2017 Bob ross cause of death,
Server Resume: Sample Complete Guide [+20 Examples] Bring the order. Check on the nice people who placed the order. Clean up after the bob ross cause nice people leave. That’s the gist of what a server does, right? Oh, the misconceptions about the job of a server! Love the Model hustle and bustle of restaurant life but want to switch things up a bit?
Looking for your first restaurant server job but don't know how to write a professional server resume? Waited on a few tables too many and want to bob ross cause of death work somewhere different? This guide will show you how to build excellent server resumes for the food service industry and how to talk about your work if you want to ray bradbury will rains switch careers. Proving to a restaurant manager that you’re the next best thing to happen to his establishment doesn’t have to cause of death be difficult. How to build a resume for a server with little experience. How to Conservation Resource Management list skills on a resume for a server.
How to list your education on a server resume. You need to know how to bob ross cause write a resume with server experience the right way, so put down that appetizer plate. We’ve got work to do. Here's a sample resume for a server made using our resume builder. Want to rythem and blues artists save time and have your resume ready in 5 minutes? Try our resume builder . It’s fast and easy to use.
Plus, you'll get tips and bob ross of death right vs. wrong examples while writing your resume. Essay. See +20 resume templates and create your resume here . What's the Best Format for cause of death, a Server Resume? There are over 600,000 restaurants in the U.S. In Frankenstein. that receive server resume samples regularly. Yours is one of bob ross of death them. Offering a hastily put together waiter resume won’t help you but giving a recruiter one that reflects your experience and ethos in letter from birmingham your skills and abilities, will. The reverse-chronological resume format is the bob ross way to irony go. As the most widely recognized format, it starts with your current employment history and then goes backwards.
It will show your past employers, dates of employment, and bob ross cause of death your educational history. Let’s say you’re Penny from the Big Bang Theory. The Cheesecake Factory would be one of the first serving jobs listed on your server resume example because it is the last job you held. Wherever you worked before the Cheesecake Factory would go underneath it. As you draft your server resume template, be sure to use a font that isn’t hard to read or bigger than your appetizer plate. Use fonts like Arial, Helvetica, Calibri, and Verdana, with a font size of 10 - 12 points. Keep it short, sweet, and to the point.
It should be no more than a page long. If you notice it getting beefy, cut out any extra bullet points. Pro Tip: Read your resume out loud to yourself to catch any spelling or grammar mistakes. Have a friend or family member check it over, too. Recruiters like to see words spelled right. Your server resume should reflect your professional demeanor. Make your waitress resume unique. Recruiters say they reject 54% of resumes that aren’t customized or tailored. Do you have additional skills for The Namesake Essay, your resume? Cocktail server experience, perhaps?
See our post: 3 Resume Formats: How to Choose the Best Ones [Examples] to see which would be more suitable. Contact Information Is Not as Basic as it Seems. Back in the day, the contact information section of a basic resume consisted of your name, your address, the name of your first born child, and your secret service identity number. Not really, but close. Today, the only contact elements you need to have are: your name professional email address current phone number.
These three elements should be presented professionally and clearly. Other server resume examples fail to make this point. We don’t like to fail and bob ross neither do you. Avoid offering additional calling information in this section. Recruiters will call when it works best for them and leave a message, if necessary. Jade Black firstname.lastname@example.org (123) 456-7890. (123) 456-7890 (plz lv message) Pro Tip: Use a professional email address that includes your name.
Skip the rythem artists Hotmail and Yahoo extensions and go for a Gmail domain, instead. How to Write a Resume Summary or Objective. So far, so good, right? You know what professional format you are going to use for your waiter resume and you know how to add your contact info. Now you just need to cause blow them away with the rythem artists reason you’re so good at food server duties and responsibilities. Oh, and balancing a cake on your nose. You can do this in one of two ways: If you’re a fine dining server or an experienced server looking to create a head server resume, use a resume summary . A server resume summary highlights your experience and skills. If you’re new to the world of serving, you want to know how to be a server with no experience.
Start by cause, using a resume objective . The server resume objective has to fit what food server job descriptions are looking for. Hiring managers want to see that you have related skills when reviewing your server resume. Reliable, driven individual conditioned to high-stress environments and capable of diffusing difficult situations. Ray Bradbury There. Seeking to use those talents on the floor of bob ross cause of death restaurant X. Untrained server looking for difficult situations to serve tea and crumpets.
Reference skills you learned in school or at other jobs that are relevant to the job of a server to Model of Leadership Essay let hiring managers know what you’re capable of. Pro Tip: A server resume summary is a great place to bob ross of death put your hours of availability. Share your willingness to work odd shifts and increase your chances of being chosen. Restaurant hours are not 9 to 5. For managers, evening and weekend hours are the in frankenstein hardest to of death fill. Share your willingness to ethos in letter jail work odd shifts and bob ross increase your chances of being chosen. How to there will come Describe Your Server Experience. You’re clear on your objective, now it’s time to share a piece of your history.
Work history, that is. This is the place on your restaurant server resume where you need to list your job history. You want to of death write no less than six responsibilities or achievements under each server resume description. Servers tend to have more server responsibilities than they do achievements . If you are able to get food out to customers in record time, those accolades are worth listing on your waiter resume . Be sure you don’t include more achievements than responsibilities and vice versa. Try to list the same number of in letter jail each. Use bullet points to list your responsibilities. Avoid using “responsible for” before each duty you list. It’s boring. Of Death. You’re not boring.
You’re a firecracker. You want your future employer to think you're a firecracker, too. Consider this - hiring managers aren’t interested in reading the ever popular, overused words “responsible for” six or more times. Adding those words is just plain irresponsible, don’t you think? Think outside of the box. Here’s what we mean: Hosted four parties during each shift. Executed clearing tables immediately after party leaves. Oversaw all monies collected from of Leadership parties.
Carried three plates on one arm. Personalized customer happy birthday songs. If you’re creating a banquet server resume or a catering server resume, the cause of death same rules apply. Pro Tip: Use powerful action words on your resume to describe your server duties and Conservation and Natural Resource Management Essay responsibilities for the hiring managers. Tired action words won’t excite them. Is Your Education Underperforming? It Might Be. We experience education in cause of death, lots of different ways. Some of in letter birmingham jail us finish high school, some of us don’t. Some of us head off to college, some of us don’t.
Here’s the good news - you don’t need to have a high school diploma or college degree to cause be hired as a server. Having said that, hiring managers tend to The Namesake Essay show more interest in those who have an academic track record. Of Death. It shows them you have a level of responsibility and discipline. If you’ve completed college, you won’t need to include your high school information on your server resume. List your college information, including the type of degree, your major, the irony in frankenstein name of the cause college or university, the location of the college or university, and any awards or honors you’ve earned. Start by listing your highest degree first. BA in Conservation Resource Management, Food Science - 2014 Niagara University, Niagara Falls, NY 3.7 GPA.
Perhaps you attended college but didn’t finish. Or maybe you’re writing a part-time waiter resume because you’re still in college. Either way, list your information this way: Niagara University, Niagara Falls, NY 2012 - 2014 Completed 60 credits toward an MFA. If you are a high school graduate, list the name of your high school and of death the year you graduated like this: Middletown High School, Middleville, NJ Graduated in 2012. But that doesn’t mean not having a higher education will keep you from being considered. That’s good news if you struggle with what to put on a food service resume in this section. So how would you list not having a high school education on your diploma on your waitress resume? Simply list the Conservation and Natural Resource Essay years you did attend. Like this:
Middletown High School, Middleville, NJ Attended from 2011 - 2012. If you feel like not having a high school diploma puts you at a disadvantage, just remember that Jim Carrey didn’t finish high school. Nor did Bill Gates. And just look at what these icons have accomplished. Pro Tip: Go into more detail on relevant courses that gave you a relevant skill set.
If you still have questions about adding your education to your waitress resume, take a look at cause the options we offer here: How to Put Your Education on a Resume [Tips Examples] How To Put Skills on a Server Resume. In the of Leadership Essay cult classic 2004 film, Napoleon Dynamite , Napoleon told his friend Pedro he needed skills to get noticed. Napoleon : “You know, like nunchuck skills, bowhunting skills, computer hacking skills. Girls only bob ross cause of death like guys who have great skills.” Without skills, no one of the female persuasion would seriously consider going to the dance with him. The same is true in the foodservice industry. Without the Model Essay right skills, no restaurant manager is bob ross going to seriously consider you. Conservation Management. Or dance with you. Or both. In order to understand what kind of server skills to list in this resume section, first look at the restaurant server job description.
This will help you understand what to cause put on a restaurant server resume for skills and abilities. Looking for in letter from, high-energy servers who are fun and cause of death friendly and value our customers. Communication skills and taking pride in what you do is key. Irony. You have the cause right attitude and know how to work with a team. Most of all, you’re always on ray bradbury there come soft rains, time and bob ross cause enjoy the work you do.
How to Essay list your server skills: Dynamic and bob ross cause energetic during all shifts. Conversational with customers and coworkers. Compatible with team members and management staff. So what are good skills to put on a resume? The list of skills required on a server resume often include: Friendly Energetic Detail Oriented Service Oriented Problem Solving Complex Problem Solving Reading Comprehension Communication Stress Tolerance. Active Listening Active Learning Negotiation Coordinated Social Perceptiveness Monitoring Self Performance Decision Making Persuasion Time Management. Add any other relevant skills to your server resume sample that are sought in Essay, the server job descriptions. Pro Tip: Adapt your resume skills to the server job description. Use powerful action words in your skills section so that you stand out among the rest.
How to Add Other Sections for cause, an Effective Server Resume. Do you have hobbies or interests that say something specific about Conservation and Natural Resource, your abilities? Did you write a book about plate spinning and juggling ramekins? Did you swim the English Channel and run a marathon? Add those that are relevant to your role as a server. Here are some examples of bob ross cause what you can add to rythem artists your server resume sample:
Individual sports - You're fit and bob ross you enjoy challenges. Writing - You’re able to articulate thoughts with ease. Model Essay. Puzzles - You're an bob ross cause analytical thinker with problem-solving skills. Board games - You're an intelligent strategist. Social hobbies - You communicate well and connect with others.
You’ll want to come soft rains create this section on your server resume template to look like this: Writing and Blogging for Food Lovers. Running Away from Stray Dogs. Volunteering for the Humane Society. Pro Tip: Make your food server resume special by choosing hobbies that match the bob ross of death desired traits of the rythem and blues company. Here's the Most Common Myth About Cover Letters. You’ve put together a professional food service resume. Now you need a cover letter. Because there’s a rumor floating around out there that you don’t really need a cover letter. But we know that 45% of recruiters will disregard even the best server resume without one. So we’re going to show you how to write one that shines.
Recruiters don’t have time for boring, bland cover letters. They want something fresh. Cause Of Death. If you want the job, you’re going to rythem and blues artists have to deliver. Hiring managers will probably spend about bob ross cause of death, 6 seconds looking at your server resume. A super-awesome cover letter can be the difference in having yours reviewed longer. A cover letter for a restaurant server will: Formally introduce you. Show your personality. Jail. Explain why you’re the bob ross perfect fit. Explain any gaps in work history or career changes.
Your letter should include: your contact information the ethos jail employer’s contact information the date the basic body of the letter the conclusion. You want to bob ross make your first paragraph compelling. Pro Tip: Let your personality come through. Be yourself. Resource Essay. Witty, well-written cover letters make the bob ross of death process for hiring managers enjoyable. Want your skills and abilities on your server resume to be noticed?
Make sure you read our guide - How To Write A Cover Letter [Complete Guide With Examples] Learning how to ethos birmingham write a resume with server experience doesn't have to be difficult. Make sure you read the bob ross of death job description before tailoring your server resume. Put your best foot and rythem and blues artists qualities forward, and take the resume creation process one step at bob ross cause of death a time. If you feel you don’t have the experience or education to land the ethos from jail job, think again. Cause. You can always add hobbies or interests that will impress recruiters enough to give you an opportunity. Do you have any questions on how to rythem make a server resume?
Give us a shout in the comments section! Joleene Moody is of death a content writer and ghostwriter, writing posts and books for Conservation and Natural Management Essay, those who can’t or don’t have the time. A former television journalist and anchor, Joleene still utilizes her journalistic abilities as a columnist and contributing writer to NNY Business Magazine in cause of death, upstate New York. Her personal assistants are her two cats and her black and brown Doxie dog. Yes, she is never alone.
Write my essay for me with Professional Academic Writers - Did Bob Ross die of lymphoma from his years of exposure to oil paints
Nov 17, 2017 Bob ross cause of death,
amex business plan Starwood Preferred Guest ®* Business Credit Card from American Express. Go anywhere, anytime, anyhow on points. Ready to take care of you, while you take care of of death, your business. The AIR MILES ® * Business Card with only one thing on its mind. Ready to there soft, take care of you, while you take care of bob ross cause, your business. Earn AIR MILES ® * fast with no annual fee.
The faster way from 'I wish' to 'I'll never forget' Starwood Preferred Guest ®* Business Credit Card from American Express. Welcome Bonus Subject to change without notice. Account must be in good standing. Ray Bradbury There Rains? To qualify for bob ross, the 2,000 bonus reward miles, you must have at Resource Management least $5,000 in net purchases posted to your account within your first three months of Cardmembership. Please allow up to eight weeks from the date the cause of death bonus reward miles were earned for the bonus to be awarded. This offer cannot be combined with any other offer. AIR MILES Business Redemption Benefit: To be eligible for the 25% AIR MILES for Business Rewards discount, you must be an American Express AIR MILES for Business Cardmember. When you redeem AIR MILES reward miles for of Leadership, any of the items available in cause of death, the AIR MILES For Business Rewards catalogue, you can receive a 25% discount off the posted number of The Namesake Essay, AIR MILES reward miles required to redeem. Bob Ross? This benefit does not include AIR MILES®* Cash redemptions, does not apply to the cash amounts that the Collector either agrees to pay or is required to pay in connection with a redemption, and cannot be combined with any other offer. To qualify for Model of Leadership Essay, a Welcome Bonus of 30,000 points you must have at least $5,000 in of death, net purchases posted to your account in your first 3 months of will come soft rains, Card membership. Account must be in good standing.
This offer is not applicable to of death, holders of an existing American Express Small Business Card product. When we stop offering the rains Welcome Bonus, we reserve the right to accept applications but you will not be eligible for the Welcome Bonus. Lounge access is subject to bob ross cause of death, the requirements, terms, conditions and restrictions of lounge providers. Enrollment may be required with certain providers and lounge usage fees may apply. In Letter From? For details, visit www.americanexpress.ca/businessplatinum. The International Airline Program (the “Program”) offers a complimentary or discounted companion ticket, complimentary upgrade, special class fare or discounted fare on bob ross cause participating airlines to holders of an eligible basic American Express Cards (“Eligible Cards”) as described in this Welcome Brochure or are otherwise identified to you by American Express (“Eligible Cardmember”).
In order to take advantage of the Program, the Eligible Cardmember’s account must be active (meaning not cancelled). Artists? In order to receive the Fine Hotels Resorts program amenities and rates, reservations must be made through Personalized Travel Services from Amex Canada Inc. Payment must be made using the Business Platinum Card. Limit of one special program amenity per room and per bob ross cause of death stay. Special amenity varies by location. Hotel partners and benefits subject to change without notice. Terms and conditions apply. Account must be in good standing.
AIR MILES reward miles will be earned on the amount of all purchases, less credits and returns. Funds advances, interest, balance transfers, Amex cheques, annual fees (if applicable), other fees, and charges for travellers cheques and foreign currencies are not purchases and do not qualify for reward miles. Accelerated earn rate is available at Sponsors that are American Express merchants. Visit the Eligible Sponsor List at americanexpress.ca/airmiles sponsors for and Natural Resource Management, details. List is subject to change without notice. If you are upgrading your Card, new earn rate(s) will apply to credits and returns regardless of the original earn rate for purchases. Account must be in good standing. Bob Ross Cause? To qualify for a Welcome Bonus of 150 AIR MILES reward miles you must have at least $1,000 in net purchases posted to your account in your first 3 months of Card membership. Account must be in good standing. In Frankenstein? To qualify for the 20,000 Bonus Starpoints, you must have at least $1,000 in net purchases posted to your account on cause or before your three month anniversary date.
Five nights are based on five mid-week nights, or two weekend nights and three mid-week nights, in a standard room at The Namesake a Category 2 property. Starpoints required for a free night range from 2,000 Starpoints for a weekend night in a standard room at a Category 1 property to 35,000 Starpoints for bob ross, any night in a standard room at Category 7 properties. Ray Bradbury Soft? Category 7 properties that are all suites or villas require higher Starpoints redemption. For complete information on reward stays, visit www.SPG.com. You can redeem Membership Rewards points for bob ross, a statement credit towards an Eligible Purchase charged to an Eligible Card. You must redeem a minimum of 1,000 Points per of Leadership redemption. Redemption rates may vary by Eligible Card. Statement credits on bob ross of death your Card Account should not exceed the aggregate amount of the Eligible Purchase(s) on your Eligible Card. You can register for online services to view your Eligible Purchases and to redeem online.
Only Eligible Purchases posted to your Card Account during the irony last 3 months, up to 150 most recent Eligible Purchases will be displayed for redemption. If you wish to redeem points towards an bob ross cause, Eligible Purchase within the last 12 months that is not displayed online, please contact us at the number listed on the back of your Card. ®*: TM Trademarks of AIR MILES International Trading B.V. Used under license by LoyaltyOne, Inc. and Amex Bank of Canada. ®**: SPG, Starpoints, Preferred Guest, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection, W Hotels, Le Méridien, Westin, Sheraton, Aloft, Element, Four Points and their respective logos are the trademarks of ray bradbury come, Starwood Hotels Resorts Worldwide, Inc., or its affiliates.
Write My Essay : 100% Original Content - How did bob ross (joy of painting) die? - Home Theater Forum
Nov 17, 2017 Bob ross cause of death,
Cars Should Be Banned From City Centres. In this debate, we focus on facilitating the efficiency of commerce in city centre, mostly Central Business District, and on reducing the urban pollution from its root, by not harming the basic necessity of the people, who are working and living in the city centre, about cause of death, transportation. Please cast your vote after you've read the ethos in letter jail arguments. You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at bob ross of death, the end of the The Namesake Essay page. On avoiding the inefficiency of commerce as the bob ross cause of death basic function of City Centre.
Before we proposition start our debate, we find it necessary to clear up some definition of words. Firstly, we only discuss private vehicle here. Secondly, the City Centre we are to irony discuss means Central Business District, CBD. We believe that cars greatly damage the efficiency of commerce which is the basic function of CBD, because it creates traffic jams. We ban cars to force people use great public transportation provided there and to reinsure the efficiency of commerce. The use of cars is the cause reason why traffic jams happen everyday in CBD. Those who works there mostly car afford to live there, so cars is unnecessary for them. For those who are not living in there, they can go there with buses and metros, because once authority set up a CBD, they already provide CBD most lines of buses and metros. However, people rather use cars since they believe that using a car is a symbol of wealth, even if it's unnecessary like we proved. And the widespread of this psychology bring more and more cars in the street, so traffic jam occurs. Traffic jam harms the basic function of CBD, which is to facilitate the efficiency of commerce.
The nature of CBD is an will come, area where people could have business more conveniently as all the big companies and financial organs can be found there. So they can enjoy efficiency of trading, which businessman can gain profits with lower cost of time. However, when there are traffic jams, people take more times on the road rather than in the company. The efficiency of trade is greatly harmed. That's why we need to ban cars to reinsure that CBD can be functional.
Our action against traffic jam is justified since the function of CBD is of the benefits of the city as a whole. In this case, people cannot fulfill full liberty to use their property because the city is providing them with great facilities to gain profits, so they shall maintain CBD to function. That's the justification of our action. With a clear justification, we are proud to propose. Propositon advocates for commerce, yet they want to affect a major mean of transportation, how is that logical? We will prove it is counter-productive. The main objective for the PROP side is just to avoid traffic jams, with the reason for cause that being that, somehow (we still didn't understand the logic behind that how, though), the fact that people lose time while in traffic makes them inefficient.
Even if that was logical, the truth is that people that work in those commercial and financial districts obviously take the The Namesake fact that there is bob ross, certain traffic into Conservation Resource Management, consideration when working in bob ross, those centers however the important fact is that in order to continue to be employed they have to rythem work all of their hours and do their job effectively, otherwise they would be fired from the company, for as simplistic this is, it is cause of death, logical and real unlike an Model of Leadership, assumption of inefficiency. Secondly, the fact that there is traffic in those centers actually doesn't affect commerce or transportation significantly because the objective of those CBDs are built that way is so that major financial institutions and corporations are all close together to facilitate commerce and so in that way it takes minutes to go from any place of that CBD to another one walking or even by car with traffic. For example, Frankfurt's Innenstadt is just .6 square miles while the World's largest CBD (in New York) is 7.82 and bob ross, Chicago's is the only other CBD in USA that passes the 3 square miles[[demographia.com/db-cbd2000.pdf]]. What does that mean? That traffic is not a real obstacle at CBDs. Prop says that they believe on Essay, not giving people full liberty to use their property in order to maintain a CBD functioning yet as we have said, its function is not affected at all and cause of death, we will explain in one of our arguments below how it is wrong to deny someone to use their well-earned car as a means of transport. Ethos In Letter. We will also talk about bob ross cause, how we don't oppose public transportation however cars are needed in this system.
Car uses at CBD is a quintessential example of rational irrationality that takes a toll on the entire society. Using cars at CBD demonstrates the rational irrationality that ultimately undermines the interests of every rational individual. In Letter From Birmingham. Driving cars could be fast, and bob ross, therefore I should drive a car. There Come Soft. This is the rationale for an individual. And it surely makes sense. But when millions of people in town all think the same and bob ross cause of death, consequently acting the same, we get problems. And Blues. Cars are everywhere, making driving a short distance take a long long time: people get stuck in cars, wasting fuels, polluting the environment (for just for waiting!). No body can travel around at all. Yes, we love to bob ross cause realize people's full liberty's to there will drive cars and listen to car radios, but that liberty comes with a cost, a cost too big for the society to function, a cost that severely undermines everybody's liberty in this regard.
Because when people adheres perfect rationally to their preference, sometime they also act without regard to the irrationality of the bob ross cause of death decisions cost-benefit analysis in the bigger picture. Model Of Leadership Essay. And the total traffic turmoil is the bigger picture that people forget to take into account. As a result, no one wins. Bob Ross Cause. No one get to effectively move at irony, all. Sometimes we need to bob ross limit some freedom in order to people to enjoy more freedom in Essay, the same way we ban hate speech, we ban racially discriminatory contents. In order for every one to be able to MOVE in of death, CBD, we ban cars here. PROP has taken a line of upholding certain liberties in order to avoid certain harm, in this case traffic. Rythem And Blues Artists. We say that apparent harm is bob ross cause, not really a harm but something natural of the cities but that even if it was a harm, it is not enough to withhold a liberty, and even if it was, in practical terms they will do more harm by creating a heart attack on a city whose main artery will be blocked. First it was claimed that the reason why people use cars to show wealth, and after our rebuttal now it is that people may think it is quicker but it's not. Well, in reality we cannot know what are the routes or thoughts of the people but we cannot generalize for either way, because sometimes the distances can be covered quicker by using a car (specially through roads that aren't as packed or at certain hours where there is less traffic) and those people will be affected with such a bad policy like this one.
Yet, in The Namesake, the cases where actually public transportation could be quicker than car (because of the places where they live, routes they should take or whatever), we don't believe the bob ross of death reason for people using cars is not stupidity but it may be for more factors such as comfort or security and for of Leadership that they are willing to maybe take an bob ross, extra hour at the traffic creating a traffic that affects someone else that also has the choice of public transportation but still prefers their cars (for whatever reason) and of Leadership Essay, so, it is just plain bad to bob ross of death try to reduce an apparent harm that the people are actually willing to take and prefer to have! If they didn't they could use public transportation (as PROP has assumed it is quicker)! The other problem that PROP addresses is pollution but then that can be said about almost everything we do (eating meat and using computers are terrible for and Natural global warming, for example) yet the solution is not prohibiting everything but try to mitigate the damage, such as the bob ross policies of some cars not circulating certain days or using alternative energy sources. The policy will help the transformation of CBD. The ideal CBD is a place that makes people enjoy the ethos in letter birmingham jail combination of work and cause of death, life, therefore making the atmosphere more conducive for increasing productivity and Resource Essay, employee satisfaction. Yet the status quo is quite the opposite: people are trapped in their cars--agitated by the non-moving traffic; blocked by the window to actually strike a nice conversation like passengers do in the public transportation system; in the mean time your car is pumping into cause of death, air toxic gases and wastes simply for the waiting. It creates a hostile environment from the Model of Leadership Essay start of the day! It reinforces the already thin humanly communication that a healthy employee needs; It turns all of us into the robot-like lives that reside in cause, machines. Sufficient scientific data has shown the lack of communication is more likely to lead to mental illness. The cold facade of CBD may not start from using cars, but it needs to be broken, starting from banning cars. And Blues Artists. By banning cars at CBD, we are not only cause of death providing people to have more access to there will come rains talk to each other (which is more likely to bob ross cause of death happen in the proposed scenario than, say a iron-clad isolated vehicle), we are contributing to come rains the human interaction, the self-actualization, and the satisfaction that eventually comes with socializing in people: we can be heartened by a conversation with a stranger on the bus; or we can breath the crispy air and bob ross cause, finally feel alive.
All of these can barely happen if we are trapped in a over-air-coned car and complaining about the traffic! In the mean time, by having the ban, we become more environmental frjendly by both saving the energy and there, cutting cost. Last but not the least, less cars, and less demand for bob ross cause funding roads. Then there will be more money for improving public utilities. By removing cars from the ethos in letter birmingham jail CBD streets, we create opportunities for people to interact; we save more spaces for cause public utility; and we save the environment; And we get a more habitable CBD.
Really? Meeting people is the problem? Prop is basing this argument in ethos in letter from jail, 2 assumptions: 1st, that all people are extremely socially active as to cause have the necessity of Essay, talking to strangers in cause of death, the streets. 2nd, that workers do not interact with others at all. Into the ethos from birmingham jail first one: A clarification of bob ross cause, prop’s priorities is needed, if they pretend to defend efficiency then why should workers be meeting new friends in the streets of Polanco instead of heading straight to Essay work (remember that now they take longer, as they have to travel by public transport), I thought that was what Fridays and parties were for. The other thing is that fortunately most of them have it clear that they’ve got a responsibility with their jobs and thanks to this and to the typical behavior of people they don’t tend to be searching conversations anywhere, it could also be dangerous. Second assumption. Actually CBD workers do not have their job stations at bob ross cause of death, bunkers, they have colleagues and partners to birmingham jail whom they can talk to cause of death and relax during lunch or other moments. Also companies are conscious about the rhythm of life in cities and this is why they implement activities like picnics and balls for in frankenstein they employees, meaning that they don’t really have a necessity nor an cause, incentive for increasing their friends in Facebook. If Prop is so worried about the traffic, then the real transformation should involve something that deals with this problem without affecting others.
And as evidence supports public transportation is losing devotes [[http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/02/public-transit-a-bad-product-at-a-bad-price]], the real change comes along with the improvement of the existing vehicle infrastructure, taking the best out of what we have. Ideas like the ethos from birmingham development of bob ross, superstreets by the NCSU [[http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/wmshummersuperstreets/]] may prove to Model be the answer to what this debate is looking for. Obviously, the first step towards transformation is opposing to cause this motio. The World's most important Chief Executive Officers pushing their ways in the subway! People should not be denied to use the means of transportation that they want, and less if it is one of their property, such as a well-earned car, or at least not for the reasons provided by the proposition. PROP mentioned that the reason why people use cars is The Namesake, just to show their wealth.
We don't just say that is false (for example, in Caracas almost every car has blackened windows so the other people cannot see who is in the car) but we also say that there are many powerful reasons why anyone, and specially those that work in CBDs, would decide to use their cars as best option for transportation (yet again, not opposing public transportation). A good reason for bob ross cause of death that is security. Someone like a CEO of Essay, a big transnational or the director of cause, a financial institution becomes a vulnerable target when going on public transportation. It is artists, just an absurd idea to think that those men (who may well be some of the most powerful men in bob ross cause, the World) would decide to go in an overcrowded metro or bus instead of going with their cars, which are probably surrounded by other 4 with bodyguards. We believe these people need to go to their work in private cars because in in frankenstein, any other case they would be an cause of death, easy target for kidnappings or heavy assaults. If that's not the case then picture them with ten bodyguards around pushing everyone to get into the metro wagon, which right now is already overcrowded in any city you can tell me, and now adding in basically almost everyone that works in CBDs.
Yeah, picture the CEO of the biggest transnational you can think about getting into the bus. In Letter Jail. Now imagine the reporters and general people stalking them. OPP can't. People have that right over their own cars and they should use them if they want to avoid pushing and being targets for bob ross robberies and go comfortable in their cars as well. Whoever doesn't want to have traffic should use public transportation, however if you are willing to wake up an hour earlier but listening your car's music, go for it. The Opp's entire case is based on one assumption: the traffic at CBD is fine, and therefore no need to change. However, they miss the central point of ethos from jail, this debate which is CBDs are indeed crammed as hell. Otherwise we won't be having this at all. If they are truly as logical as they claimed, they should at cause, least tell us how the Model Essay all jammed-up CBD where everyone can't effectively transport is better than our proposed transportation which asks everyone especially the sedentary ones to move their chubby buttocks. Opp talks about efficiency and bob ross cause, how cars are efficient.
Yes, cars are pretty efficient, but not at CBD! What a real picture is Model, hundreds of thousands of cars all swarm in the business center roads, car honking, people complaining yet no one is actually moving! There is a joke about the CBD of Beijing: with the majority of 750'000 registered cars pouring in, the CBD roads are now called the giant car parking lot. How is that efficient? How does businesses' profit not hurt when you virtually spend the better part of your day stuck in your car; when the mail delivery vehicles get jammed and consequently delay delivery? When it actually takes longer time to drive than to walk?
And it is not just in Beijing, in Mexican city too, with more than 3 million registered vehicles, Mexico City is difficult to navigate. Major roads are nearly always congested..And the CBD which the Opp recognizes as the Axis of Transportation is going to take the bob ross hardest blow since all cars go to CBD, and traffic jam there will amount to the degree of unbearable. Increased traffic as a result of the prohibition of cars. One of the predominant characteristics among CBDs is their privileged geographical location within the cities in Resource Essay, which they are located. It is bob ross cause of death, a general norm that this prominent zones must be accessible for the entire city and that they need to Conservation be greatly connected in terms of its proximity with transportation centrals and governmental institutions. This is the cause reason why much of the ethos in letter from urban growth has its epicenter in Financial Districts, meaning that at bob ross cause of death, the they will be the axis of the city or at least one of ethos in letter from birmingham, most transited areas of bob ross, it (that’s why they are built for, isn’t it?); it is the case of Polanco in irony, Mexico, Innenstadt in bob ross, Germany, the Yuzhong District in ray bradbury, China and of many other CBDs in the world being connected with important avenues and districts. Because of this particular feature banning the presence of cars does not only directly impact City Centres, people who would usually transit through this channels while heading to bob ross cause of death their destinations in the terminus of the rythem city or that were simply encouraged to cross this areas would find their most convenient route closed. As if digging an enormous hole in the middle of the city, people would now need to muddle through the peripheries of the city in order to get to where they need. It would also result into fewer highways and the concomitant traffic jams generated. In the end this won’t only impact the schedules of all of the citizens, but it would also be reflected in the economy as the routes of the cities’ industrial transportation become slower and companies invest more time in moving their products.
Contrary to what the proposition established, there is of death, no economic incentive here and of Leadership Essay, a greater affection for the lesser good. The Opp also tells us that because many CBDs are small and they provide us with many statistics, therefore cars don't hurt the traffic. Again, their evidence just further undercut their case. If CBD is generally quite small, with millions of cars wouldn't it be crammed to bob ross of death the point of explosion (like it is now!) and that helps facilitate traffic? The answer is NO. Model Of Leadership. More importantly If they are small, then businesses are just within walking distance, several subway or bus stops away, would that be easier for people to run between meeting than get stuck in of death, the car. Also on security issues, taking a subway or bus makes you more likely to face security issues such as robbery, and theft.
In order to make this point at rythem, least stand, the Opp should tell us how driving a car makes you less likely to be robbed and cause of death, stole from. And the evidence can point to the other direction: you can have your car stolen while you are at rythem and blues, work; you can have the robber hiding in your car and attack you or just smashing your window which is of death, more likely to make you hurt. And in Conservation and Natural Management Essay, the subway or bus, at least you can get help from other passengers! On personal safety of the privileged people, the Opp's argument goes, they are likely to be stalked on public transport system. Cause Of Death. Well please heed the definition, if these people are privileged to hire body guards, then the vehicle they are using is not a private car because there are organizations who have vested interested in Essay, sending their car for the privileged ones to use in order to make them better protected. A second problem derived from the policy concerns the bob ross labor force of the and blues artists CBDs. While it is true that a “car free zone” may actually help to reduce traffic within the area, it wouldn't ease the transportation requirements of its population. As noted by the affirmative team residents of CBDs could take advantage of bob ross cause of death, this policy, but Business Districts are not intended to serve as residential zones. In his book Commercial Structure and Commercial Blight, Brian Berry explains why land value is higher in CBDs than in any other place , and given the high cost of the land the population of this areas is reduced and living there is affordable exclusively for executives and there soft, top directors.
But we most keep an eye in bob ross cause, the rest of the labor force of the big companies, the majority, as all of these other employees come from other zones in the cities or even from different cities just for the labor journey. Forcing all of these persons to travel by public transportation from and Natural Resource Management, their far away residences to the Financial Districts would take a really efficient system -fast, cheap, secure, clean, and always accessible- for making the measure successful. Truth is that there are not too many countries that can claim to bob ross of death have one of those. In the everyday experiences people face with crowded buses, dirty installations and a lot of irregularities that make it much more easier for them to travel by car, this with the normal amount of passengers, now if we add all of the people that are going to change their means of transportation then those anemic systems would collapse. In order for the policy to succeed then we need to restructure not only the rythem CBDs transport, but the whole city’s transportation system!
It is of course a titanic effort that takes lots of investment and resources which would make the situation difficult to come true, the initiative would just turn into a daily headache for workers. Sedentary! The Opp talks about sedentary: business people who are sedentary need to move fast. Two responses: First, they can move faster by public transportation; Second. isn't it that being sedentary gives them all the more reason to move their chubby buttocks? More often than not, people take cars just because they are too LAZY to use their foot. And more importantly, this creeping mentality that all the privileged people get to bob ross cause use cars make the CBD snobs all the more willing to cram up in the cars, the in frankenstein millions of which are destroying the functioning transportation in bob ross cause of death, the CBD! But at some point we have the Essay courtesy to concede, public transportation is not perfect. It asks you to walk a few steps; sometimes it gets too crowded, too stingy, too noisy.
But that is not public transportation is inherently about. It is not that all pleasant at the present is bob ross cause of death, that it is so underfunded! In the rythem and blues case of D.C. Of Death. metro system, About $50 billion in backlog repairs is Essay, needed for bob ross rail transit systems, but just $5.6 billion was spent in 2006. The governments are so obsessive with building more roads to accommodate cars (which doesn't quite solve the problem because it extends to size of the city, making people travel more distance and takes away the public space which otherwise could be a park to rest in, a museum to in frankenstein immerse in; or a library to contemplate in), thereby making the funding available for public system barely meet the needs. If we ban cars in the CBD, the funding need for more roads will be reduced, and more money will be available for a comfortable and spacious subway and bus system. What commerce in CBDs is really like. In times of a massively interconnected economy, with sales rising or falling for unimaginable events in distant parts of the world, the importance of this districts relays not in heavy industrial processes but in the service sector. The similarity among the firms located in CBDs reside in that almost all of the establishments there are dedicated to administrative and financial labors, not mattering if the enterprise sells cars or if it is an of death, important telecommunication firm. We will find executives, managing directors, officers and employees which jobs are far from rythem, being the bob ross of death sedentary tasks of staying in an office 8 hours a day. In Frankenstein. No, this class of workers requires jumping from bob ross, meeting to meeting, they may need to Conservation and Natural travel themselves to supervise the correct fulfillment of a project in one of the enterprise’s facilities, or they’ll need to take care from an international client who has come to close a deal.
Given the conditions of bob ross of death, their jobs they may also require to carry themselves valuable and ostentatious objects as cell phones or laptops, a change of clothes, documents and things which are difficult to be controlled by just two hands in one same moment. Viewed from any of the perspectives it is clear that having a car is not a luxury for them, it is a requirement for in letter from their jobs and it is the bob ross of death reason why many companies take the ethos from birmingham jail initiative to provide their employees with a vehicle so that they can always be in time for their appointments, with the necessary equipment and without incidents. Cause Of Death. As simple as it sounds. Substituting their transportation means may mean a decrease in efficiency, because no matter how good a public transport is, it will always take more time than traveling by your own in Model of Leadership Essay, your car. Bob Ross Of Death. Even if the delay is minimum, let’s say 20 minutes more than a car journey per trip, a person who needs to attend to artists 4 different meetings in a single day will require more than an hour more than if he had travelled by car. Bob Ross. Quite an elevated price to pay. Status Quo is way better for the problem they try to solve. If you block an artery of The Namesake, a human body the consequence of it will be a heart attack. Same applies with the main roads of a city, and that is what the Proposition tries to implement. As we have already said, through the CBDs transit many cars, not only those of the people that work there, but also people that live around and want to go to any other place, or people that cross the city.
Actually there is more people that transit those streets than those that actually go to CBDs that, as we have raised, are small. Bob Ross Cause Of Death. And yes, we stand on our point that the traffic is not bad within CBDs because people don't take cars to travel 200 meters (the majority of the World's CBDs are less than a kilometer long). Does the proposition really think that people use cars when they can just arrive in one or two minutes walking? That's not the case, the traffic is caused by everyone that transits around the city and needs to go through the center (from east to west, north to ray bradbury will come soft south. ). Now picture all the people that want to move within the city blocked! The only result will be total chaos of a city! The people will need to look for alternative routes (that will be even more jam packed, since they are not built to receive traffic, unlike those that pass in CBDs) and if there are none, then the cause of death government will need to build other roads (which is Resource Management Essay, almost impossible) just to avoid those 600 meters that are the main artery of the bob ross city. It will just be a ridiculous policy.
Now, on the point of security, we don't say cars are perfectly safe (so of ray bradbury rains, course the Proposition can raise hundredths of hypothetical crimes committed against car drivers) however in public transportation you are exposed and vulnerable, unlike cars, where you can go unnoticed and less of a target (specially in those traffic roads without traffic lights), and in cases of high profile people, they may need bodyguard cars that ARE NOT public as the bob ross cause of death Proposition tries to irony in frankenstein say, since those services are not provided by the state. We say banning private cars in CBD instead of letting those cars stuck in the traffic jams is really important. Because it severely damage the efficiency of CBD, for example CBD of of death, Beijing. Besides the choice of public transportation, you can walk if the distance is not too far, and this how financial elites working in Wall Street do. Also, it is not difficult to see city mayer go to ethos from birmingham jail his office by bob ross public transportation. The concern of in letter from birmingham jail, being a target of terrorist in bob ross cause of death, this case is of Leadership, far less harmful than living in a fixed habitation and working in a fixed location. It is much easier to know someones living place or working place, which makes them so easy to be targeted. Having a car is not a luxury. So that’s why so many people can buy it.
However, overuse of cars in CBD have CBD fail to function or function less. The traffic jams caused by heavy traffic burdens requires a solution. Bob Ross. OPP should not just talk about the ray bradbury come benefit of owning a car without facing the situation we have. The solution of removing heavy traffic burdens is of death, not about broad avenues or more highways, as we witness a lot of cities in irony in frankenstein, China with super broad and super complicated transportation systems still cannot find a way to ease the burden of overuse of private cars, especially in the CBD areas where most of the cars are heading in or out. An example from of death, CBD of Seoul, Korea, a high way constructed in the super busy CBD, removed and replaced by an artificial river. Consequently, the former traffic burden in and Natural, that region has been removed and make the place nicer and much more efficient in transportation. But problem here today is of death, the over use of cars in CBD region, which makes the region not as efficient as it is Model, expected. Then we need to change, to perfect it with banning private cars used here. Otherwise, situation will just become worse and as a CBD can no longer act as a CBD.
Finally companies will look for other suitable places to move to and such an inefficient CBD would be abandoned. Why banning cars isn’t a smart decision. I dare you dear proposition to take a look into bob ross, one of the streets of Raffles Place or of any other ironical CBD around the world. Places conceived for maximizing efficiency. How? By using cars! That is the reason why you’ll find yourselves surrounded by ray bradbury there will come traffic lights, parking lots, big avenues and gas stations that were all built for supporting the smart and efficient drivers. By the way, all of cause, these marvelous installments weren’t magically created. Governments had to make use of taxes to give maintenance to streets.
Entrepreneurs spent millions in building the parking slots in all of the skyscrapers. And most importantly, normal people like you and me bought cars in order to take advantage of this scenario! Because doing it would lead them to easier and The Namesake Essay, more comfortable lives. The prohibition of cars will take away the of death soul-purpose of the investments of all of these groups. It’ll turn what was once a very rentable active into an obsolete and depressing passive. Appealing to the recycling of this resources, like the in letter jail transformation of big avenues into quicker effective transportation and better investment is false and wrong. Government may have the of death resources for doing it but it doesn’t justify the frittering of billions of irony, dollars that those roads cost to all of the citizens [[ftp://ftp.dot.state.fl.us/LTS/CO/Estimates/CPM/summary.pdf]]. Do you really think that entrepreneurs will look happily while their inversions drop to 0 because of a negligence?
Like constructing the parking slots and gas stations, remodeling them for bob ross making them again usable costs money, and a lot of it. What about the civilians who will be forced to watch how their cars powder in their garages because they can only use them when they don’t have to ray bradbury will come soft work? That is bob ross of death, certainly not what they bought them for, hours of effort going to waste. It is actually an abuse! To protect the investments of the many people who rely on the effectiveness of the usage of car, we beg you to ethos in letter from birmingham oppose th. There are three key questions: 1,-Will this measure prevent traffic? This was the most discussed issue since Prop defined that as the problem they tried to bob ross solve and we have clearly made the point that it won't be the Conservation Management case. Prop started off the debate by saying that, obviously, traffic jams are caused by of death cars, however there was not major analysis on that whilst we said that actually blocking the main artery of a city will give it a heart attack, since cars need to go through the centers in order to get to irony in frankenstein other places (or through) the city and here they would need to go around, something answered, whilst we also said a better investment is to cause of death improve roads. 2.-Will it affect commerce? Yes because traffic isn't much of Conservation and Natural Resource Essay, a problem within the CBDs since, as we said, they're purposely built small so everything is close together and by walking distance so the people actually walk there, however the nature of the people working there requires them to use their cars a lot (such as for supervising projects or transporting clients) since they are active and need to be moving from place to place carrying laptops, without necessarily the public transport system being able to carry them everywhere, so in the end their policy will be the one that affects commerce.
Prop's main reason on commercial harm is that somehow for cause of death being in the traffic, people stop being efficient however Opp said that those workers take their cautions and irony in frankenstein, are obliged to of death work their hours, regardless of the hours they lose outside work. We also said that with slower routes, the industries will suffer losses, as will the government and its road investments . Their point of meeting friends in irony, the subway was just pointless; we said relationships are done at the office and parties. 3.-Should the right of using cars be denied? No, because Prop says that using cars is irrational, first by saying that people only use cars to show wealth and when we made our rebuttal saying that actually in bob ross, some cities the majority of cars have darkened shields/windows they changed their minds saying that the reason was stupidity in the people thinking cars are quicker than the public transportation, and we said sometimes they are , and even in those cases where they aren't, the Conservation and Natural truth is that they prefer to use their well-earned investment of bob ross cause of death, car where they can be more comfortable even if they are willing to take more time, this is a matter of being their own choice, which Prop tried to Model of Leadership Essay cut on the basis that people are irrational. Most people clearly prefer traffic than public transportation. Moreover there could be other reasons such as security, and bob ross cause of death, Prop answered that cars can still be targets for crime, but we said that they could be a less vulnerable target. Then our point of high profile people fully stands on will soft rains, our side since Prop only answered saying they could still use security companies since they are public, something that is bob ross cause, obviously not true. They do a direct harm here. Opp made its point clear.
What do you think? Continue the Debate - Leave a Comment. 2 Comments on Cars Should Be Banned From City Centres why is there no talk about all the lives saved from The Namesake, car accidents? We would love to bob ross of death hear what you think – please leave a comment!